643 karma · joined October 9, 2015
I'm gonna stop you there. At the very least you can speak up in the USA without getting disappeared.
aside: wonder why for group theory (51) Lagrange's theorem is only stated for cyclic subgroups, instead of any subgroup.
Recent as in it started the instant the 15th amendment was passed.
Electronics: https://www.google.com/search?q=6.115+final+projects
Interactive music: https://vimeo.com/user42907764
Product design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKSAz3yxMM
If I tell you B = (dA_z/dy - dA_y/dz)i + (dA_x/dz - dA_z/dx)j + (dA_y/dx - dA_x/dy)k do you instantly see what operator is applied? That's why you just write B = ∇×A.
People presenting ideas in shorter notation is not showing a lack of progress - usually it's the opposite. In old optimization papers people would write out the entire normal equations, entry by entry. Not really insightful at all, compared to A'Ax = A'b.
The last line of defense for conservatives is "well actually there's a silent majority that thinks otherwise" and "actually most people don't care, they're just virtue signaling". And this works well when the Fox+ apparatus are the ones creating boogeymen out of minor things like CHAZ.