In the case where you got your preference you'd mostly see controversial books disappear from the shelves. The business they bring wouldn't be worth a lawsuit.
1,690 karma · joined October 5, 2017
adam@zerok.com
In the case where you got your preference you'd mostly see controversial books disappear from the shelves. The business they bring wouldn't be worth a lawsuit.
The connection between wrongdoing by Google is even more attenuated here, since Google is mostly an indexer, with limited curation.
https://www.grantthornton.com/insights/articles/tax/2023/sec...
Personally, I found there is a application complexity ceiling above which LabView was not viable. It is pretty great for rapid data collection and analysis, and it is well integrated with a variety of hardware. But once there is a few things going on at once the "backplane" abstraction becomes unhelpful.
So many vendors provide python libs these days, and python plotting is good enough in these that it is harder to justify LV.
I remember trying to help a friend with their PHP assignment in college (~2001). I had only ever worked with C, C++, and java in my classes and I just remember being was confused as hell since I couldn't understand why PHP worked the way it did.
For private companies, and an SBIR ,you have to establish an indirect rate based on your actual costs. The rate is the ratio of all indirect costs for the company vs the direct costs for the project (salary times the % of the person's time). It's a bit of work the first time you have to do it.
I'd be surprised if the NSF lets the uni just put whatever they want down and it isn't based on submitted budget data.
I can see how the indirect costs ("overhead") seem like ripoff to a professor, but even if you are running a private business having an indirect cost rate of 50% is considered low-to-normal. At least where I am: rent, utilities, cleaning, bathrooms, etc... are just expensive.
2019 = 41
2020 = 48
2021 = 56
2022 = 56
If you can't discuss the facts in a civil manner I am not going to discuss the issue with you any further.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/crime-homicides-...
https://sfist.com/2023/01/03/sf-sees-exact-same-number-of-ho...
The assertion that, because they put ads in, that it is the business-optimal thing to do is weird.
1) Use Task.Run and await its result whenever you need it.
2) make a blocking call; same as if async wasn't available.
How does having option 1 make the situation worse?
* pull based -> you don't need to worry so much about rate-limiting like you do with events
* works well when needing to pull over slow communications (serial, remotes)
I explained the my application was remote support of engineers /customers working in on our hardware microscopes (similar to an electron microscope).
The sales rep says they are only interested in selling life sciences /drug companies. So I would recommend against anyone contacting them who want to use this for general purpose AR.
I want to provide remote instruction and see through a user's eyes to help them fix/debug hardware. 2D AR is good enough.
Hololens is winding down. What's the next best thing?
There is no way a non-internet business would cut off a client of 4-years without actually talking (phone) to them.
(AI risk is an entirely separate issue)
When I first set up my company's website it was hosted at GoDaddy. Totally static site. It got 'hacked' one day, with new php files and redirecting users to some nonsense. This was August 2016. The ftp server had a very long, random password. I changed it again after this.
It happened *again* March 2017, though different files were added. After this I moved my site to Digital Ocean.
I never found out how this happened.
Does anyone know how long this has been going on? The article didn't give a definitive start date.
The only I've used and like goes out of stock regularly though.
please explain why they shutting down airspace without a statement. If they think its a balloon, why not just say 'radar detected a probable balloon and we are shutting down airspace while it is being investigated.'
Why was the incident over Alaska described as a metal cylinder or whatever if its another probably balloon? This doesn't make much sense.
Even when data are publicly available their use can breach what we call textual integrity. This is a fundamental principle in legal discussions of privacy. It requires that individuals’ information is not revealed outside of the context in which it was originally produced.
First, if you click the associated link link there isn't any indication this is a widely accepted view ('fundamental principle'). I'd never call myself an expert but I've never heard of this.Second, the way I read this is that they are trying to analogize scarping the web to feed it into ChatGPT to someone following you movements in public recording it all.
Even if you believe in their legal theory of privacy is right, wouldn't Google would be far larger offender than ChatGPT?
The script is something like this:
Person1: Arg! This thing!
Person2: What ya working on?
Person1: <...> is giving me trouble.
Person1 then figures it out while trying to explain it, or Person2 has a helpful idea. Happens multiple times a week. If you were working at home you wouldn't even know you were missing out on this interaction.
Also, WFH is also just too distracting if you have a family/roommates etc...
I'm sure there are plenty of jobs where regular, informal face to fact interaction didn't help me solve problems faster, but not in my line of work.
I have some interaction with Federal employees too. They have been out of the office for a long time. You now have more a problem getting a hold of someone who is nominally 'at their desk'. I don't know why this is, but its a fact.