Not so sure about the rest of your complaints.
1,690 karma · joined October 5, 2017
adam@zerok.com
Not so sure about the rest of your complaints.
If we choose our password from only ~24 chars then you can get the same effect of 100K iterations form just 4 more characters, or ~1 more dictionary word.
That doesn't seem excessive
If it is true a few extra characters is as good as having sky-high iterations, the guidance should be on 'forcing' users choose long-enough passwords, not in this nitpicking over the 'right' # of iterations.
We are a small company that sells very complex equipment to labs around the world. The users are smart / PhDs, they just need to be told what to do to fix things when they need an adjustment. This is large physical scientific equipment and the stuff requires 'hands-on'.
Obligatory Links:
https://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/09/politics-isnt-a.html
https://blog.givewell.org/2009/12/14/charity-isnt-about-help...
https://www.amazon.com/The-Elephant-in-Brain-audiobook/dp/B0...
Also you are assuming you can have 'same' service after banning targeting. That remains to be seen.
Also, you could consider disagreeing without being rude.
Good for megacorps who don't need targeting and can be pay less for ads.
Bad for small/niche advertisers who do need targeting.
Neutral for the vast majority of consumers who don't appear to care about tracking.
It would seem to set up a situation where your incentive, if you suspect a Ponzi scheme, is to quietly withdraw your money early then keep your mouth shut. Unfortunate if true.
There are dozens of small optimizations in my tech that where painstakingly discovered through years of research and iterative improvement. These are not cost-effectively patentable.
Even if you believe the trade secrets 'work' do you think companies are going to document every design of optics, electronics, laser frequencies, rf powers? Then if we did then we'd get a series of posts about how onerous the regular confidential info acknowledgement forms are for the employee.
Not to mention, once it becomes 'commonly known' via disclosure, it may not even be protectable anymore.
Non-competes sidestep all these issues. Sure, if they are overly broad its bad, but they have an important role to play.
I also find it very interesting to look at the pedagogy of these sites. In the case of this site, it starts with a lot of history and computing. This is common for books, but asking a new user to wade through so much preamble before any 'meat' is asking a lot. In the first part where code is shown/explained:
https://www.learncpp.com/cpp-tutorial/statements-and-the-str...
is a lot of upfront jargon for a newbie to process. ('pre-processor directive')
It does do a good job of showing how to set up visual studio. However these days, a htttp://repl.it is surely a MUCH easier way to get up and running.
I wrote a very small ultra-beginner guide for a young relative to learn C. It gets right into what C code looks like, makes connections to the math they have seen in school, and tries to hold back terms until they are really needed (omitting details where needed)
It isn't polished designed for widespread use, but I think for the truest beginners its better than other guides I found on the web.
I'm not sure to whom the rest of your response is addressed, this was a technical question.
OK higher is better sure, but is moving from 5K iterations to 100K per the recommendation a similar precaution to adding 1,2,3 digits to the master password?
I use http://www.circuitlab.com and find it to be quite good for laying down parts and doing simulation including time-dependence and with parameters. Very reasonably priced IMO.
Win 10 issues in this vein were a bit annoying but no too terrible
I've been dreading having to move to 11 someday. All the bad parts of 10 get cranked up. We can't even create local accounts (as is appropriate for a single-user / shared machine.)
I have been liking other Microsoft software the last few years. But why are they ruining Windows for any professional use?
Admittedly it will be a bit hard to follow without the accoupling lecture, but if you zoom in and press the buttons (cool, compress, etc...) it looks cool at least!
(it only performs well in chrome-derived browsers)
https://twitter.com/adamvsteele/status/1598842550797754368
Honestly I'm surprised why it even refused my first question. But ... "Ve haff ways of making you toc"
Most people keyed into this from the Vox article:
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/5/7/21247602...
Which links to:
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1172959
As evidence for the claim that Gas range put out more PM2.5
But if you consult table 3 of that article you will see it doesn't show that at all. The food (especially frying) swamps differences between electric vs gas ranges, which themselves aren't even significant.
Brainstorming:
- Sue them, aggressively.
- Looks for exploits in their own systems and publish their code, making it worthless.
- Publish lists of their owners and employees and/or ban them from Google/Microsoft services.
I'm sure folks here could think of more/better ideas.
Environment.GetFolderPath( SpecialFolder.LocalApplicationData)
in Windows this maps to ~/AppData/Local
An in Linux to ~/.local/share
so it is configured well------------------
This will relegate Signal to niche use.
I don't even know if I will keep it and I've been a booster for years. I'll have to remember which ~5 of my contacts use Signal, and mentally update that list when/if any join?
Can't take on that cognitive load for everyday comms.
-------------------
Can anyone get these to printout larger, and where the grey comments are less washed out?
https://zerok.com/assets/slides/MM2022_Vendor_Tutorial.pdf
slide 28
Background: This is SIMS data (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_ion_mass_spectrometr...). We have a new instrument can perform these analyses at much higher resolution than has been possible historically.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/why-alphafold-wont-re...