113 karma · joined May 12, 2016
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor#Origins_and...
For the sake of hypothetical example, presume I have had a long history of involvement in some C++ libs which I associate with good times, hilarious IRC sessions, friends, and pouring love into the labor of creating them during 0300 caffeine overdoses. How could I possibly evaluate leaving this behind without such bias?
Many choices are vulnerable to silly human biases which are hard to detect. Debating C++ versus Rust seems to be tough for some, and technical arguments have a propensity for becoming circular, so here's an analogy instead.
- Imagine, (if you have no extreme attachments to the web) that we have created a new web with new protocols, software, hardware, solved most crypto issues, authentication is reliable, we created the safe and anonymous place of everyone's (some ppls) dreams. Most of the advances are wonderful and (mostly) fueled by the latest research and smart minds, but there are a few bugs. Overall, an improvement and well adopted but still needing polish. The problem? All the old content isn't there. Some amazing new experiences await, but reddit and youpn are not unless you pull up an old web browser. If you were tasked with creating new content, which web would you choose and why?
I propose devs consider following either this, or some other method to evaluate C++ vs. Rust more objectively and try to set attachments aside. If, rather than thinking "but I won't have libX", you ask "how can I implement this functionality better today", you may decide that casting off old clutter is liberating and insightful.
I hope this helps some of you.
To clarify, I've watched friends and colleagues gain and lose employment like crazy and I've seen a lot of racism in the industry, among other things.
Sounds like a good open hardware/software project but I'm short on cameras and mics for something like that. Anyone see potential there?
Combine with laser rangers and filters for their wavelength on the cams, and you can sample 3d point cloud data too and render the environment as a 3D (4D) scene, use it for composite reference, or slap a small LiDAR scanner under the whole thing for precise measurement.
I worked with a talented Nigerian radiologic technologist who abruptly left and went home to sell tires and car parts because he couldn't handle people being so cruel all the time (West Texas). I hope this guy has a better go of it than he did.
The article leads with subtitle "Vice President Biden announces a forthcoming covert strike against Russian president Putin..."
1) We don't announce covert operations. 2) It's personal now? US vs. Putin himself? lol 3) The author declares "presumably in the form of some kind of cyber-attack" without citing where this comes from at all. You get the idea... I could go on and on.
Please don't post this drivel here, articles with journalistic integrity and facts are preferred.
While typing this on Firefox mobile (just installed to reevaluate), I must use portrait mode for my keybpard to work, my on-screen nav buttons are not redrawing because my screen lock activated w/FF up causing a bug to manifest, and I'm only here on HN because the sites I intended to browse won't load or perform very poorly, one site linked from an article had a 1 min load time, and video plays at ~3fps on any site.) After I type this I'm returning to mobile Chromium, even though I hate Google. I feel like just throwing this phone at the moment. Some user experience.
Is a logo going to correct this? Same reasons I've evaluated and dismissed FF for years now.
That, and I am attached to the damn Firefox, they're killing my favorite software mascot of all time.
Heck, I'm done typing, I get a half second delay every time I backspace and my on-screen arrows which magically reappeared a second ago are behaving randomly (i.e., jumping right one word and one space when I hit hit left once.) T9 would have been easier. Off to remove блядь FF... Congrats on like half a logo design though Moz, I'm sure it will solve your problems, lol. Maybe try not letting your enemy choose the battles, push for usable and accessible standards that aren't designed to sell us more middleware and Enterprise Edition duct tape.
I used to make exceptions for polite site operators who aren't needlessly rude to people who choose privacy and security, after evaluating their choice of ads. Never again. It is not our responsibility to support bad business practices out of guilt, perceived value of consumed content, disabling security features "to enable content" or otherwise. Crying that their business model is failing doesn't get any sympathy from me when it has been a problem for years.
Is there an ad network out there which you would trust to serve you content?
To that end, check out this [0] anti-mosquito laser weapon, which they claim can be tuned to target only females based on wing beat frequencies. While I disagree with the principal, a laser mosquito defense system gets cool points from me for creativity.
[0] http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/laser-...
Forbes and others are blocked on my home DNS for hostility and crippling of features. If a company can demonstrate how it protects its visitors from its advertisers and respects my rights, I used to exempt them from my ad blocker. Now I'm sick of seeing rude messages targeting me as an ad blocker user telling me what a horrible person and a thief I am, so I block all ads, and I've discontinued use of nearly all ad supported software. Bottom line: It's not our job to make their business models work, they need to adapt and quit whining.
Also smuggling data out of containers or vms might be possible by these means or manipulating signals measurable across security boundaries. One could encode bits in the cpu utilization of a process and watch the load from another app outside the secured area to read encoded data, or by loading/unloading a measurable amount of data in RAM, for example. Where did my foil hat go?
Gridcoin pays cryptocurrency for 'mining' through a proof of work concept using Boinc credit.
But who cares where the carbon emissions from all that mining go? Someone else's atmosphere, no? At least a productive output would offset the needless waste.
A quote: "Researcher Sebastiaan Deetman came to the conclusion that at bitcoin’s current level of expansion, it will require 14 gigawatts of electricity to run by the year 2020 — an amount of energy equivalent to that of a small country, like Denmark. At the current time, a single bitcoin transaction requires as much electricity consumption as the daily consumption of approximately 1.6 American households."
via http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/04/03/bitcoin-could-consu...