HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

bachback

1,000 karma · joined May 19, 2013

submissionscomments
bachback··on Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices
Bitcoin does not require "identity management". That is why it works. Ripple/Stellar requires explicit trust - money gets created through obligations. That is also how the fiat money system works. In Bitcoin there is no central authority making press releases.
bachback··on Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices
Stellar is not decentralized. If problems like this occur, there is the Stellar organization /corporation, to enforce consenus. Whenever there is a legal entity behind it, it's not de-central. Bitcoin has solved all these problems. Ripple was invented before Bitcoin. Stellar is a Ripple fork.
bachback··on Safety, liveness and fault tolerance—the consensus choices
The Ripple / Stellar protocol is bad, so this is not a surprise. Ripple was invented before Bitcoin. Ripple/Stellar requires explicit trust, where Bitcoin does not. Also the distribution was widely known to be gameable (I know many people involved who managed to get free stellar). The only surprising thing is that Stripe and Ravikant invested in a technology which is obviously inferior to Bitcoin. Prof. Mazieré and JedMcCaleb have no significant background in economic research and it shows.
bachback··on Stripe raises $70M at $3.5B valuation, double that of January
Yes, quite. Look at this chart[1] and animation [2]. You will find that there are almost no IPO's below 1B$ in the 2010's. What used to be the default option, became: stay private as long as you can. If Stripe is worth 3B$ now, what stops them from going public? Same for AirBnb (13B$ est) and Dropbox(10B$ est).

[1] http://cdn.ientry.com/sites/webpronews/article_pics/tech_ipo...

[2] http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/05/17/business/dealb...

bachback··on Stripe raises $70M at $3.5B valuation, double that of January
IPO certainly not - it's extremely unattractive in the current regulatory regime (death of the IPO [1]). I wonder what their long-term strategy looks like given their margins can't be very high as a front-end for credit card companies.

[1] http://www.vox.com/2014/6/26/5837638/the-ipo-is-dying-marc-a...

bachback··on John Carmack on shadow volumes (2000)
"Putting creativity on a pedestal can also be an excuse for laziness. There is a lot of cultural belief that creativity comes from inspiration, and can't be rushed. Not true. Inspiration is just your subconscious putting things together, and that can be made into an active process with a little introspection. Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it. If you aren't sure which way to do something, do it both ways and see which works better." - John Carmack
bachback··on How the World’s First Computer Was Rescued From the Scrap Heap
see also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_Space

http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/digitalphysics.html

bachback··on How the World’s First Computer Was Rescued From the Scrap Heap
Time to correct the record: the World's first electronic, programmable computer was build by a German by the name of Konrad Zuse in May 1941 [1] called Z3 [2]. He designed a language for it called Plankalkül [3].

Eniac was announced in 1946. Incidentally Turing wanted to be build one in 1945, called Electronic Brain. His paper "on computable numbers" was published in 1936.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z3_%28computer%29 [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plankalk%C3%BCl

bachback··on Light Table 0.7.0
Good news! I'm going to switch from Emacs some of the time, and hopefully 100% eventually. The thing that bugged me was how uneven the way editor would react in some cases. For me it didn't have the reliability I need. I was interested in the fundamentals and found underneath is code-mirror. I thought eventually all code-editing should move into a browser, but isn't quite there yet. Hopefully this will move to 1.0 and be a full emacs replacement.
bachback··on What can I only do in Erlang?
HN is just mean and boring for downvoting this. Gotta leave this place.
bachback··on What can I only do in Erlang?
Examples can be found here http://zeromq.org/docs:labs AFAIK Twitter storm uses ZMQ under the hood.
bachback··on What can I only do in Erlang?
Better yet: ZeroMQ is not even a language. What ZMQ does it lets your write extremely performant and reliable distributed systems in any language. It is a layer over sockets. Any complex system will have to interact with other complex systems, which are written in other languages. Say you develop a service and a lot of people want to use it. What API are you going to expose? One that is only based on Erlang primitives? Certainly not, because then you have limited your user-base to a small number of people.
bachback··on What can I only do in Erlang?
Tell that people who are trying to build scalable network applications. Saltstack uses ZeroMQ under the hood and the biggest cloud computing operations in the world use it. That article reads like from a past age, where you didn't have startups scaling to millions of users based on cloud computing. HTTP was invented for retrieving hypertext documents. Not for connecting millions of nodes.
bachback··on What can I only do in Erlang?
ZeroMQ gives you the same but better: messaging in any language. That means you can interface to any component you want written in any language you want. Also hiding native sockets, which means networking is not 1:1 but based on scalability patterns. At some point people will realize what a big deal that is.
bachback··on Facebook's Top Open Data Problems
true - Facebook scales linearly. If you're interested in really hard problems in distributed systems & blockchains let me know. Facebook should not own social data. the future will be end-to-end encrypted and de-centralised.
bachback··on The Domain Market is a Mess
DNS is a mess - it's like politicians and marketing guys designing the web.
bachback··on Minimum Viable Block Chain
proof of stake was first proposed in 2011 on bitcointalk, the go-to reference for everything bitcoin/altcoin.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_Stake

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/

http://bitshares.org/security/delegated-proof-of-stake.php

If any coins make it you can see at watching the marketcap of the coins at http://coinmarketcap.com

bachback··on Minimum Viable Block Chain
that part of the problem is partially solved. not every node has to "mine" all blocks. in fact in PoS there's no mining at all. the big problem is that you create all coins at genesis. there are a bunch of proposals and work in this direction.
bachback··on Intertwingled: The Work and Influence of Ted Nelson – Starts at 9:30AM PDT
how sad that this doesn't even the front page of HN. he's the inventor of hypertext.

I recently wrote to Mr. Nelson and he is still working on his grand dream.

bachback··on Intertwingled: The Work and Influence of Ted Nelson – Starts at 9:30AM PDT
hmm, interesting, fascinating and sad. the article mentions Mark Miller. He has done very interesting work (works at google).

http://research.google.com/pubs/author35958.html

bachback··on Intertwingled: The Work and Influence of Ted Nelson – Starts at 9:30AM PDT
this is a Ted Nelon tribute event. so the title should name him first!

some lectures of his here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdnGPQaICjk

bachback··on To don't (2012)
TODO:

* write an AI which writes the todo list

* follow AI's todo list

bachback··on I wish I could read Wikipedia like this
welcome to Ted Nelson's original idea of hypertext. further information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hypertext
bachback··on Practical Cryptography With Go
thanks. but why has crypto to be equivalent to "heart surgery"? if I would describe the state of the art of Internet security I wouldn't apply that term.
bachback··on Bret Victor's favourite books
he would likely enjoy Lawvere's conceptual mathematics.
bachback··on Ethereum: the Yellow Paper [pdf]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

"The problem with an informal fallacy often stems from a flaw in reasoning that renders the conclusion unpersuasive. In contrast to a formal fallacy of deduction, the error is not merely a flaw in logic."

bachback··on Drop Dropbox
agreed. perhaps crowdfunded open security is the only way to go.
bachback··on Drop Dropbox
I'd suggest the alternative http://mega.co.nz
bachback··on Condoleezza Rice Joins Dropbox’s Board As It Names New CFO, COO
"sudo apt-get remove dropbox", never to return. it seems obvious that most US tech companies have not at all realized that they are a global business, and the implications of the Snowden summer.
bachback··on Ethereum White Paper
I believe a solution would look more like what Hal Finney called transparent servers [1]. This would be a way to solve the issue of scaling (and getting rid of mining oligarchs), but also dealing with the necessary privacy issues of contracts. Also DNS is not really a contract between 2 parties, but N parties, and there is a relationship between DNS and contracts (more on that per PM by request).

[1] http://www.finney.org/~hal/rpow/security.html

← PreviousPage 5 of 12Next →