There were allegedly lots of epicurean communities in the antiquities, many of those in Europe, which became monasteries.
Epicurean communes were, for all effects and purposes, communism.
1,129 karma · joined May 12, 2014
There were allegedly lots of epicurean communities in the antiquities, many of those in Europe, which became monasteries.
Epicurean communes were, for all effects and purposes, communism.
What I understand is that the contemporary conception is that the mass does not change.
I just presented the argument for a notion of rest mass and relative mass.
For a moving object you could then m=(Er+Ek)/c^2, which creates the impression that the mass is variable (as the term Ek is zero when at rest and increasing with velocity), giving rise to the terms 'rest mass' and 'relativistic mass' respectively for the rest energy and total energy equations.
This interpretation is somewhat outdated but the terminology rest mass maintains its legacy. One could refer to it as the `(proper |invariant |intrinsic )?mass` instead.
The variable mass issue is then 'solved' by 'refactoring' the equation to use momentum where mass is coupled with velocity, over which the complexity of the lorentz factor is engulfed.
Ek=mc^2/√(1−(v/c)^2)−mc^2
For v<<c you have significant discrepancies on the energy required to accelerate to a specific speed with regard to mass. I.E. Newton: Ek=(mv^2)/2
As v->c it does not matter as much, the lorentz factor is much more significant, the mass operates just as a base multiplier and sum factor.
As v->c, x->0 where Ek~1/x, i.e. tending to infinity with a division by zero when v=c.
In conclusion, the speed is the relevant factor instead of mass when near speed of light, regardless of the object being an electron or the mount Everest.
Of course, assuming the equation holds ;-)
If it did not have that snark though, one could make the point that the data could still be 'deanonimitized'.
Of course, it can be beneficial if you want to keep a baseline that's important for your health.
Otherwise, something that's very risky if taken in the younger years.
For me, in Brazil, surrounded by waterfalls and beaches it's not only common but also necessary for you to relax sometimes.
That was equally kind blowing to me.
And how does that make you an asshole?
Most of the reason Europe was able to even have access to Greek works was due to Arabic translations, in many cases the originals do not exist anymore.
While in Europe the barbarians were ravaging the remains of the Roman Empire and entering into feudalism and the 'dark ages', Hindu and Greek works were being studied and improved in the Arab world (e.g. Algebra, Algorythm words coming from Arabic works).
These later would be brought to Europe via trade with italian city states and copied by the church.
Could you clarify that? I understood that as both cases are separated by a channel (Panama vs Suez), or did you have another meaning?
Saying that as a Brazilian that is astounded every time Latin America is implied to not be 'western'. I would feel offended, but I understand that is useless to me, the same thing with the term 'American'.
Let them live in their happy bubbles, it's a disadvantage of their own creation.
The library on my uni when I was in Math undergrad did not have AC at the beggining but was the only place where I could do any work, it was extremely difficult and I am sure impacted my progress.
Of course malicious behaviour will not comply, but would at least filter the mainstream products.
So, for a free, subsidized public channel, it makes a lot of sense to offer something different from the commercial crap.
I learned a lot watching public funded science divulgation material.
E.G. shallow perks as ping-pong table, snacks, videogame, beers in the office but totally disfunctional management and work-life balance.
Using the latest shiny tech just because it makes it easier to target these groups and replace the burned out ones.
I see this happening a lot on finance and consulting jobs outside of tech too:
- Offer a reasonable salary for interns/trainees (not reasonable relative to the responsibilities though)
- Promise a huge corporate salary with benefits for the ones that are able to remain more than x years
- Burn all of them out, working overtime, abusing from young inexperienced people
- Promote a couple from dozens of people to serve as an example of successful cases
- Fire or continue abusing the rest
- Rinse and repeat
In the end you acquired a couple of indoctrinated corporate zombies as well as years of cheap hours from the other ones.
Just take a look at every year's trainee program and the mind washing process from banks and corporate consultancies. Do the candidates really believe that the company needs so many trainees each year? The turnover is a feature, not a bug...
Edit: Just noticed my point is not related to your argument, and I actually agree with you.
There are mythical accounts verbally communicated for geological events like mega eruptiona spanning tens of thousand years.
I believe in that, but I also think you're underestimating the effectiveness of social control when done competently, which IMO is what's China's doing.
You don't need to control people's minds, just their social acceptance and livelihood guarantee.
This is a pretty interesting idea, I wonder if a consistent model of EM frequency damping with distance traveled could be built.