bbstats

"previously people could cheat, now they can't" ?? how is that bad.

making a model worse is very easy.

Causality is literally impossible to deduce...

Gemini 3.0 is gonna cook

ok

Just read it

The data here described in the features is the data they're requesting access to. Nothingburger.

(also because it's a name, you don't capitalize all three letters)

Little reminder that Elo is a guy, not an acronym :)

The explanations here are pretty weak

Just say you're bad at pandas

Depends on your local cost of living

Slop -> $$$

You should probably add sort and search

anyone got an archived link?

The only thing that matters is your estimation of how the balance will change out of distribution or with future data etc

Gemini 2.5 one shots it perfectly...

the 2nd sentence:

"As of last week, this issue is now closed, and every single hash and HMAC algorithm exposed by default in Python is now provided by HACL*, the verified cryptographic library."

it's describing coverage.

ok.

So I guess this was written pre-Gemini 2.5

Little too easy

Am I missing something or is this just "We built models that are bad"?

A few examples are very "gum-flappy"

It looks pretty bad

https://youtu.be/PTngv5MmtXo?si=cCQcYtRaja5pPP6a

that "best of 8" is doing a lot of work. i put in the same input and the image is awful.

Could you explain "The sum of two of the numbers is equal to the third"??

I still prefer a Gaussian Mixture for this unless you're saying you roughly even N per cluster

If only there was a link to a page somewhere that could answer this question for you.

Also, stop using k-means

Lol