3,780 karma · joined January 6, 2015
Sorry, can't help commenting the weirdness of high dimensional spaces. If you take an cube of a size of a hair breadth (100um) in a space of hindreds of billions of dimensions like gpt4, distances between random points in that cube are in the order of tens of meters...
(For the curious, there is a titanium plate in my body due to an accident)
Luckily, though, then ChatGPT came. You can just ask GPT to generate the flask backend and forms using bootstrap.
What comes to european banks not wanting to do anything with US related entities, my understanding is that the primary reason is the non-trivial amount of red tape and legal risks associated with US entities weighted against relatively small amoumt of pontential customers.
The trouble with IP is that there are lots of influential people that very much would like IP to be useful in creating welfare. Unfortunately the evidence for that is surprisingly scarce. For discussion, see e.g. Boldrin & Levine
I run an old (I think maybe 4 or 5 years) thinkpad with 64GB RAM. I see often these claims of superior performance of new macs, and it leaves me scratching my head. I do not have (almost) any workflows where the performance is not sufficient. For the ones where performance is not sufficient, I am happy to turn on my desktop. So my question is, what are the workflows people have benefit from the superior performance of new macs and at the same time do not justify working on a beefy desktop?
It's a bit weird with these folks so worried about content creators, almost like I'm browsing a different internet with them. In my internet whenever I need to find some actually useful information, I almost always go to a content creator who is not ( primarily) paid via ads. HN, reddit, SO, wikipedia etc. The vast, vast majority of ad funded content is such utter crap that I am pretty confident whatever makes ad driven business worse makes internet better as a whole.
Well, on the other hand, in the successful case, why bother hiring if the digital copy already answers all questions like you (except likely faster)?
It is atrocious that you buy a bike worth an decent used car and you cant't expect the electric motor last more than a few thousand kilometers [1], after which you have a broken black box of an motor in you hands that you need to replace, not fix. Which, if you are out of warranty costs close to a thousand bucks. And it is a damn 250w electric motor.
[1] google shimano e7000 longevity
Hmmm. There is this thing within the current awful mess of a finacial system called credit card which allows me to pay very practically all over the world. Funny enough, though, that cryptofolk were at some point very vocally telling that you can "use" crypto by using a crypto credit card.
> Just FYI, payments in the traditional banking systems are very much not immediate, they just appear that way from your perspective
And that is why I was careful to formulate "In most cases, for practical purposes"
Or then we have a very different definition of "complete mess". For the record, I have no reason to doubt the value of my savings account fluctuates wildly and the savings account is guaranteed by government for my practical purposes. I can make all the payments I need to make free/with very modest fee. In most cases, for practical purposes, the payments are immediate. If I happen to need, I can borrow money against my non-money non liquid assets. I can't describe this situation as "a complete mess". To my understanding crypto offers practically none of these benefits in any kind of robust way. This from european perspective.
Or maybe I just expect too much...
The occurrence of nuclear accidents is so rare and the potential cost so high that a typical insurance company business model can't accommodate that risk.
You could try develop some kind of insurance bond scheme where nuclear power plant needs to raise a capital buffer to protect against accidents, and in case of an accident, bond investors lose their money. But even this kind of a scheme would be pretty difficult to pull off in a scale that would cover all potential losses, and someone (government) would need to take the tail risk.
And just to be clear, even now, nuclear plants do not go completely uninsured.
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/n...
There is a reason why someone way funnier than me came up with "Dunning-Krugerrand"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222682950_Conservat...
[1] https://tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/consumer-price-index-...
By the way, just started wondering why nobody is worried about the atrocious productivity development of CEOs over the last decades? Should shareholders maybe hire some consultants to advice the CEOs how they could make their work more efficiently that they could become cheaper?