607 karma · joined December 17, 2010
FWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Have you had any luck emailing the author of the paper?
Also, keep in mind that Apple themselves adopt existing open source projects for their own use. There's no reason a similar relationship couldn't exist here. And the hobbyist crowd they're currently targeting are unlikely to give a shit.
Immediately closed the tab when I got a popup asking for an email address.
I'm of the opinion that if I was going to carry around something too big to fit in a pocket, I might as well just make that thing a laptop.
- Get an alarm clock that plays cds
- Burn/insert cd
- All set! Plus you aren't wasting power by leaving your computer on all night
PS: I recommend Massive Attack - Future Proof. The slow start is pretty much perfect.
However, if you go into "Authorizing applications & sites" it has a warning box which says "An application-specific password can only be created when you are signed up for 2-step verification.", with no mention of where or how that can be done.
It'd be nice if this feature allowed me to have secondary passwords for eg google talk. I don't much care for having to hand out my full credentials just to use things like bitlbee/meebo.
A run rate is just inflating/fabricating PAST revenue by speculating on the FUTURE. Refer to my helpful chart:
| / <- SHOW THIS NUMBER TO INVESTORS, PRETEND IT WILL GO ON FOREVER
| /
|/ <- HIDE THIS NUMBER, TOO LOW
+---And that number gets even more exaggerated if I choose to base the calculation off a month where I got a bonus.
My point stands; it's fabricated revenue.
"Run rate is a tricky number, though. It’s a projection of what the company would make if you extrapolate from its most recent revenue numbers. Depending on the time frame used, the calculated annual run rate can vary significantly."
If my income keeps growing at this rate, I'll be a trillionaire in no time!
Additionally, if you're at a fund company with different share classes based on balance, you also get higher expenses by dividing things up too much. Eg Vanguard's Admiral shares reward you with a lower expense ratio for having more money in a given fund, since it lowers their own overhead.
Also, you'd probably want to go with a more broad-based index than DJIA or S&P500. Many fund companies have a "total stock market" funds where they attempt to literally buy a piece of every US stock, weighted by market cap, so you'd effectively be owning "the US stock market", rather than just large companies. There are also total international funds which do the same thing for all non-US stocks.
Also also, you should include bonds if you aren't already. Like with stocks, there are total bond market index funds for this.
In fact, if you just picked an allocation across "total stock", "total international" and "total bond" you'd pretty much be set. This is what Vanguard does for their target retirement funds: https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/vanguard/TargetRetire...
Using git would be pretty pointless, unless you're going to be frequently branching and merging against your mp3s or something.
What's a 'constant dollar'? Is that nominal or inflation-adjusted? Over that timespan the two could mean very different things.
I also like that my 'balance' visibly goes down when I use cash.
However, I also don't spend often enough that I need to go to an ATM more than perhaps once or twice a month.