461 karma · joined May 24, 2010
What I mean is that Wikipedia could learn from GitHub how a lot of forks plus easy pull requests can exponentially increase participation and generation of new content while still being able to retain quality.
It's not like someone can work on a feature that later gets merged into the mainline, right?
Why not? You could extend an article or contribute some new articles for a topic, publish the content yourself, and try to get it into the main project. Then on the main site there could be a list of forks, and even a network graph exactly like on GitHub.
Adopting the concept of forking, distributing the whole thing, and making it easy to push and pull in changes from any source would be a great goal.
Someone already started hacking on a tool for converting the dumps to Git repos, which may or may not be a suitable base to build upon: https://github.com/scy/levitation
The activity stream is just not a good tool to stay on top of what's happening when you're watching hundreds of projects.
However, the second scenario would happen every single day in a team.
Some things, in no particular order:
* The SuperMatch UI needs some more love! Just watch someone new to the site use it and you'll see what I mean.
* I think you should remove the footnote "Clerkdogs supports Firefox 3 and Internet Explorer 7". If you have requirements show a notice only when they aren't met.
* You need to fix the search field not working as expected as soon as possible. Seriously.
Last time I checked (a few months ago) it was pretty slow and unstable, but I guess the project is worth watching if you're not on OS X.