1,328 karma · joined May 2, 2015
https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/3/17317274/youtube-1-8-billi...
As for their profitability:
https://medium.com/@intenex/where-are-you-getting-hard-data-...
Are we viewing the same page? Not only do I see JavaScript in the EU page, but I also see this in the code:
"trackingServer":"gannett.hb.omtrdc.net"},"market":"gpapermobileapp","trackingServer":"repdata.usatoday.com","trackingServerSecure":"srepdata.usatoday.com"},"ads"
The reason people bring up the LG Prada is because it proves the form factor of a touch screen phone with a bottom button existed before the introduction of the iPhone.
>If it was so radical and ground-breaking, how come LG are an also-ran Android OEM and not the most valuable company ever?
Not all radical and ground breaking designs succeed. The Prada's software was also far from revolutionary or memorable for that matter.
>It's an asinine argument as it takes the most superficial elements, such as a full touchscreen, conveniently ignoring the actual things that made the iPhone so innovative, such as multitouch UX, proper web browser, full featured operating system, exclusive carrier partnerships and more.
About the only relevant thing you mentioned was having a multi-touch UX on a phone - a technology they didn't invent, but just made popular.
Do EU lawsuits require the plaintiff to pay the legal costs of the defendant if they lose? If so, I doubt we'll be seeing GDRP trolls unless those GDRP trolls are well financed and prepared to pay all of the legal costs.
The LG Prada was shown off before the introduction of the iPhone. To imply that the iPhone was polarizing/radical and that the LG Prada was not is ridiculous IMO.
https://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/apple-iphone-vs-lg-prada...
This case is far from over and will be quickly appealed as the award makes absolutely no sense and goes against the Supreme Court ruling.
What they bought likely doesn't even exist anymore in the current code base.
Additionally, the origin of iOS is based on Apple's acquisition of NeXT.
https://www.blog.google/products/google-one/one-simple-way-g...
They've offered chat and phone support for their phones and Google Play for years. I've never had a problem chatting or talking to a CSR on the phone. In fact, every Nexus and Pixel phone has a built in 24/7 support app that allows you to chat, talk or get a call back from a support person.
"Amazon Killing Off its $60/Year Plan for Unlimited Storage"
"Amazon is killing off its Music Storage subscription service"
"Amazon to discontinue Fresh delivery in some states"
"Amazon is shutting down its 'Underground Actually Free' program"
"Amazon Will Discontinue Its Vendor Express Platform"
etc...
You would also be getting Google Play Music since its bundled with Red.
You're thinking of Android Go. Android One is for phones, not made by Google, that receive guaranteed OS and security updates. All of Nokia's phones are Android One phones.
Sometimes you need to take off the gloves and get your hands dirty. Google really needs to take Oracle to task for their public smear campaign.
Which is good for Android developers as they crave that syntactic sugar. Unfortunately, businesses have different priorities.
>As for Java being popular because it has mindshare, you are agreeing with my original point. It doesn't continue to exist because it's a good language. It continues to exist because of inertia.
It may not have all of the syntactic sugar that other languages have at the moment, but given its new release cadence its only a matter of time before it reaches feature parity.
And with the introduction of Graal and Truffle I'd say Java is one of the more interesting languages to follow nowadays.