474 karma · joined July 31, 2020
ARM could be a boon for macOS gaming if it allows for better access to iOS titles.
Ultimately all physical retails spaces have the same common problem -- why should someone go into your store when they can get the same products online. This problem is even bigger during covid-19. I personally think there are two answer, one is to move the core retail business online, and the other is to create experiences people will keep coming back for. If you're making unique products it might be best to pivot online. If you're into the classic buy wholesale sell retail business than the online market can be very competitive.
A used book store can be a great place to have experiences. Authors can come and talk, you can have children story time, book clubs can meet, coffee shops pair well with book stores. You have to clear inventory to make space for experiences, but you can use it as an opportunity to remove inventory that wasn't selling anyway.
I've read a lot of sleep studies, and besides some non-scientifically published variations on Buckminster Fuller's 30 minute nap every six hour sleep schedule I haven't read about someone getting such low amounts of sleep.
Whatever course of action you take, do something in addition to or besides call the police.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbbpm/bitcoin-mining-ele...
If a game is going to support Windows + macOS than it isn't much more work to also support Linux these days. There are many games released on Linux every year.
This segment is incredibly lucrative for the winners. Niantic has an estimated revenue of 800 million dollars. Supercell's highest reported revenue was just over 2 billion euros. King sold to Activision Blizzard for 5.9 billion dollars in 2016. Epic is going to war with Google and Apple over Fornite money. There's Asian players that are also impressive, but I'm not familiar enough to speak on that market. These revenues and valuations are happening in a high growth market.
This is part of the scientific method. In astrophysics data is collected and new experiments are done to improve theory, and it helps us better understand the history of the universe and the future of the universe. Our understanding will change over time.
It records Pork at 672k calories per acre
https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/ORC00000242/PDF
EDIT: Another great quote from the PDF "The soy bean.—Soy beans lead all other crops in the production of digestible protein, exceeding corn in this respect by almost exactly 100 per cent. This crop deserves more attention in this country than it has yet received. There is no reasonable possibility of overplanting it. "
To me this is a bold claim. My understanding is eating plants is significantly more efficient per calorie than eating animals on a wide range of scales -- amount of water used, amount of green house gases produced, amount of land consumed. Can you please provide one common example in which a plant humans like to consume is less efficient than a domesticated animal humans like to consume?
Yeah, I saw (pre-covid) it all the time at the gym, at amateur sports leagues, and at health food stores. It's also worth noting that my zipcode also has a significantly lower obesity rate than the national average. If I were to go to an Alabama Walmart the fit & muscular people people would be much more uncommon.
I think the current US population that really understands blockchains is less than 1% of the population.
I know a few organizations that might fall under that abbreviation. Can you be more specific?
It's actually ambiguous if Ceres was spun up before the Epstein drive was invented or not. If the H2O was consumed in an Epstein drive (fueled by D-He3 fusion) then only Hydrogen was consumed to produce thrust. What's not ambiguous is that the H2O on Ceres was consumed
We know that mars was colonized 200 years before the Epstein drive was invented. We know that the OPA was founded about 100 years after the Epstein drive was invented, and that 130 years after the Epstein drive is when the main story starts. We know Earth was the first owner of Ceres. We don't know how old Tycho is, other than Fred Johnson was not the first leader of Tycho.
It's an open question on to what extend the belt had humans in it during the 200 years humans were on Mars before the invention of the Epstein drive. It's safe to say that answer is somewhere between more than none, and less than what is shown during the opening of the series. It's highly plausible Ceres was spun up during that time.
SQL is an incredibly expressive and flexible way to read, store, and update data. It's ubiquitous, so the SQL skills I learned six jobs and three industries ago are still relevant and useful to me today. Relational Databases and SQL are heavy lifters that I often relay upon to build projects and get things done.
The thing about SQL is that it's the fastest way to read&write data in a relational database. Maybe writing the code is faster in js/swift/php, but the code will run faster in SQL. If you need to do something to 100M pieces of data you can do a lot worse than SQL.
It's worth noting that Ceres, and by proxy the vast material wealth of the Asteroid Belt, is only 25% further from Earth than Mars is. The biggest barrier is Ceres has 10% of the gravity of Mars or about 3% of the gravity of Earth. This isn't even close to enough for anything we would consider healthy living.
In addition the spinning up of Ceres is often mentioned as one the of many engineering feats attributed to Tycho.
EDIT: For scientific context to my statement H2O can be turned into really good propellant. Two of Blue Origin's engines run on Liquid Hydrogen and Liquid Oxygen for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres_(dwarf_planet)#Internal_...