You can find these people on Elance and similar sites, but there is an opportunity for a website that is a one-stop-shop to do all of this in one place (ie. find the various people, organize listing, sales etc.).
Anybody know if this already exists?
3,184 karma · joined December 7, 2009
You can find these people on Elance and similar sites, but there is an opportunity for a website that is a one-stop-shop to do all of this in one place (ie. find the various people, organize listing, sales etc.).
Anybody know if this already exists?
This is ridiculous! It is not sustainable!
Facebook is worth $5B
Oh, come on, its a social network!
Facebook is worth $10B
There is no way it can ever really be worth that much!
Facebook is worth $15B
Oh now this is just bubble bubble bubble bubble bubble!
Facebook is worth $27B
Oh ok, cmon now, you are just having us on, right!
Facebook is worth $50B
What just because it has more pageviews than Google doesn't mean it will make money!
Facebook is worth $75B
Pfffttt.. this stock is going to tank fast!
Facebook is worth $125B and is now a public company
No way this will last!
Facebook stock trading at $80, worth $200B
It is going to be awesome to watch everyone lose their money!
Facebook stock dropped 4% today to $450
Told ya it will drop!
aka. you can never be wrong or right in these threads
For a lot of people today Facebook is the Internet
a) They aren't putting in financial performance to impress investors. They are growing the company.
b) Treat it more like a resources stock were they have large mining leases and rights, have started exploration but are 2-3 years away from actually mining anything.
Darts dip a lot in flight - they do not move side to side as much. As a dart player, I guesstimate that after only a few hours practice most people will be off 1.5cm or so in the vertical but only 0.75cm in the horizontal
Professional dart players are always aiming at 20. If they block the triple-twenty with their first or second dart, they then aim at triple-19.with some players preferring triple-18 since height-wise it is in similar range
I scanned through his blog (which is a good read) and couldn't find anything that somebody would kill him or make him disappear over.
I would be more interested in knowing why it took ZDNet 6 months to report one of their bloggers missing?
This was a big step for 3.0 adoption, but there is still a long way to go. It reminds me of PHP4 v PHP5, but with far less clear benefits (and far less support).
The Sun promotional literature[1] refers to 70%+ cost savings on their units over comparable systems from EMC (the old school market leader). It was the fastest growing product at Sun, as it allowed companies to cut down storage costs using a model similar to what Google pioneered with Big Table and GFS.
[1] http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/un...
Yes.
The license[1] mentions both 'free television' and 'renumeration from other sources'
[1] http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/avc/Documents/AVC_TermsS...
nice to have a catch-all for your mistakes
(btw the mistake they made is that they are taking pre-dilution percentage figures from 5-6 years ago and adding them to more recent percentage figures, such as Goldman, and then completely forgetting other investors - such as MSFT (preferred stock!), Accel (first VC - preferred stock!). If you add all of these percentages, you would get over 200% - article is completely innacurate)
"ah, Mr Cent.."
It has happen possibly twice.
6+ years ago I went from knowing nobody in the valley to almost everybody within a few days. Just generate buzz and build a good product.
Silicon Valley is tiny. You are only an email and a single intro away from almost everybody.
Ron shows up to the YC demo days, but you can definitely meet Ron and other angels without YC (it has been happening for years, after all). He invests very early and tracks most of the tech blogs.
The interface to using RSS has always been flawed, that is where the problem is.
Zuck and Bill deserve absolute credit for their successes.
MySpace were written off as lucky spammers, Zuck a theif, Bill Gates stole MS-DOS, etc. etc.
I wish one of the blogs would hire a good roster of tech writers and put out 2-3 good articles a day, instead of 10-15 gossipy and poorly written articles a day.
The BBS's were the foundation of almost every person I have met in tech, every job, all dev, every startup I have been involved with and there is a very strong camaraderie amongst the early BBS hackers (most of us went on to become v early web hackers).
So I see from how inside AOL you think your theory might hold, but outside of it there was an entire larger network that was far more interesting
"Google is beating Microsoft because Microsoft DOESNT EVEN HAVE A MAPPING PRODUCT OR SEARCH ENGINE.. they do not see the FUTURE IS ONLINE.. blah blah blah.. "
This is Microsoft playing defense - and cheap relative to the profit machine they are defending
The Wikipedia summary isn't wrong, it is just misleading. The inventions and innovations that lead to the industrial revolution were founded in the late 18C, but the real transformation was much later (although it did happen, comparatively, quickly)
It is a bit like saying that the 'Internet era' is from the 1950's, because that is when the integrated circuit was created
The conclusions and lead-in should have been that as with the desktop market, on the web do not trust the platform providers. reply
Ye, this isn't really true. Lets take, for example, 18th century Naval officers from the UK:
* Captain Cook - discovered Australia, mapped the Pacific etc. Father was a farmer
* Horatio Nelson - Defeated the French, considered greatest Naval commander of all time. Father was a minister
* Arthur Philip - Commander during American Revolution, lead colonization of Australia. Father was a teacher.
It is a very common misconception that in old society it was impossible to move from the lower classes into the upper classes. The British Empire, the prototypical aristocracy, was largely shaped and developed by people who were raised in the lower classes. This is because the military, navy, their universities (eg. Isaac Newton), and many other parts of government and private societies were strict meritocracies.
The upper classes actually produced a very small number of notable people, outside of royalty (Charles Darwin, Churchill, Brunel (although his grandfather was a French farmer)
(Edit: "America became the first large-scale experiment of a society that could be called a meritocracy." - Citation needed. See above.)
If you read the predictions in context, you know that he predicted a future world where we are all wearing computers that we talk to. When he pulls each prediction out, he is able to justify it with a bit of a stretch.
btw he completely missed cloud computing - his predictions have users storing everything at home on large disk arrays.
(not sure how he missed it Ellison has been banging on about it for decades)