and in Xen (which they used to run) for at least as long
14,429 karma · joined October 5, 2010
and in Xen (which they used to run) for at least as long
pure CPU should be essentially unaffected, if they're not emulating the MMU/page tables in software
the difference in IO ranges from barely measurable to absolutely horrible, depending on their implementation
traps/vmexits have another layer to pass through (and back)
these people always forget capitalism is permitted to exist by consent of the people
if there's 40% unemployment it won't continue to exist, regardless of what the TV/tiktok/chatgpt says
poetic justice for a company founded on the idea of not stealing software
how much use do you think these indemnification clauses will be if training ends up being ruled as not fair-use?
but forgot there's likely someone above them making exactly the same one about them
why am I not surprised
not a good idea
and my internet comments are now ... curated in such a way that I wouldn't mind them training on them
it turns out humanity actually invented the borg?
there is a way, just stop publishing anything and everything
small website you wrote to solve a minor tech problem for your partner/kids? keep it to yourself
helpful script you wrote to solve your problem? keep it to yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iajgp1_MHGY
seems rather apt to describe "AI"
your kids have to live on this earth too, and they'll suffer the consequences of cowardly people like that
but under the cfd mechanism the treasury takes the excess over the strike price
there's nothing bad with having a camera to spot porch pirates, as long as the data stays private
it becomes problematic when everyone's hooked up to one central place (plus the "AI")
same as the common talking points about CCTV, which always miss the distinction that there's minimal risk if it's only going to some video recorder in the back of the store
it only becomes dangerous when every shop and house are fed back to one central location
and the general public do not understand the difference
don't worry
AI will cause both losing your job AND climate change
have you seen the cult like statements they make you emit if you want to pass the interview?
I had a colleague that interviewed there (and was accepted)
over the space of that month he completely changed
(and not for the better)
how can normal people go to work and produce this output?
(I suppose everyone that is prepared to work at Amazon corporate is... a certain type of person)
> I was a huge AI skeptic but since Jan 2025,
> I'm in my 50s and have been programming for 30 years
> there is nothing that is going to stop it.
I need to turn this into one of those checklists like the anti-spam one and just paste it every time we get the same 5 or 6 clichés
could be called "entire" (https://entire.io/)
jury's out on this one too
I can believe short term productivty gain
but from someone's who has spent years un-fucking codebases that were handed over to outsourced teams... this all looks very familiar
that's probably fine then
but if they can at all: they need a driving license
it is not unreasonable for a state to want to control who is allowed to move around 1.5 tonnes of metal in a public environment
thankfully I started down the FIRE route 20 years ago and now am more or less continuing to work because I want to
which will end for my employer if they insist on making me output generative excrement
and if it doesn't spawn up another $30 instance and add another RR entry to the dns
serving static content scales horizontally perfectly
let's be honest
everyone working as a software engineer at facebook is perfectly capable of finding employment elsewhere
working there is a deliberate decision to prioritise comp over the stability of the world