https://github.com/DaveBben/esp32-llm
needs a board with PSRAM but they are surprisingly plenty these days - almost standard. I tried it a few months back.
1,043 karma · joined June 11, 2013
https://github.com/DaveBben/esp32-llm
needs a board with PSRAM but they are surprisingly plenty these days - almost standard. I tried it a few months back.
Even were it matches sorta (the 400 feet e-bike thing) that only works out for me because I use an AMD card. An NVIDIA card can have several times the generation speed at the same power draw so it all falls down again.
And the parameters they tried to standardize their figures with (the 1024x1024 thing) is also a bit meh because the SAME amount of pixels in a different aspect ratio can have huge variations in gen speed and thus power usage. for instance for most illustrious type checkpoints the speed is about 60% higher at aspect ratios other than 1024x1024. Its all a bit of a mess.
cut,copy,paste auschneiden,kopieren,einfügen
this can break the UI so you have scroll on a popup just to copy a piece of text because google put "copy" last in the selection.
it stopped working well or at all over the last 2 years or so. I think if a simple "allow access to the photo folder" would have fixed it they out have used it. maybe it doesn't get the events when a photo is made?
*OOM = Out Of Memory Error
That said I too was a bit annoyed by how it rendered the byzantine empire. I thought Carthage was meant. So i was over by a thousand years.
To me it became clear he is actually a moron and there is no deeper plan when the aspirational starship concept wasn't paired with him pointing out the other advantages it has.
For example:
* the estimated useable m³ capacity makes a special variant of a starship the equivalent to the ISS in capacity - now imagine docking 4 of those to a HUB. And that is without reusing the wet-workshop concept of space-lab.
* for the same reason nobody point out that it makes zero sense to use a starship as a landing system and not turn it into an instant moon base. The wet workshop concept applies here as well.
That is just two ways starship could be used as soon as it is orbit capable - Neither would need atmospheric re-entry
You inspired me to redo mine since I saw a new type of colour e-ink display (Spectra C6)
> This would be a game-changer! Though "theoretically" is pulling a bit of weight here...
In nat. gas this is possible - its called pyrolisis - as an alternative to steam reformation it is generating pure carbon and hydrogen instead of the CO2 and Hydrogen that steam reformation does.
Its main downside is that it takes more energy so you get less usable energy out of the process.
You can do it with other organic fuels as well and the simplest process is making charcoal from wood but its not as clear a way to separate out carbon there.
I find it wild that you used a dev board because the LDOs on them are most of the time very bad and you do seem to use 5V instead of bypassing that. The type you get normally uses 1mA just sitting idle.
Why did you use an external RTC instead of just soldering a 32.768khz crystal to the esp32? Okay if my assumption above is correct that answers that. but the external wakeup has no real advantage in power draw.
The relay eats some current and a mosfet in its place would probably be better. I assume you added it because the e-ink hat has no proper shutdown. From the looks of it you can just bypass the BUCK converter on it so just run it off 3.3-3.6v. There is a smaller BOOST converter in there that might still waste power so the mosfet might still be needed. This beings me to my next point:
you can completely do away with the DCDC boost converter by using a LiFEPO4 battery. All you need extra is monitor the voltage and have your display warn once it falls below 3V.
Anyway 9-10 months is remarkable for the LEGO approach.
I mean most classified information is classified because its classified. By that I mean it is classified because nobody declassified it. That gets you hilarious press conferences like that navy UFO thing in trumps last term where the spokesperson could only say "the US does not have the technology to build a flying object like this" (paraphrased from memory).
I am pretty sure an analyst looked at the footage and identified a sea-bird and the US does not have the technology to build a bird exactly. But analyst output is automatically classified so.....
I think these sort of graphs are simply misleading and should not be used.
Also why doesn't uploading a 1GB file to my NAS boil a liter of water? are maybe all the switches and routers used between me and the datacenter water-cooled? I mean I can see such switches existing but I don't see them be the norm. Why doesn't the DSLAM on the Street outside emit steam. Is there maybe one bad switch somewhere that just spews steam?
What I am saying is that at least that graph is without further explanation... bad.
I think at least that graph is complete non-sense. I will try and have chatGPT explain it to me.
I don't have an IP where i can just run Quassel on 443. Using it over websockets on a subdomain might indeed solve my troubles.
Its the basic enshitification playbook really. They got steamrolled during COVID by zoom and later teams somewhat interrupting the process.
I can recommend it for a Windows/Linux/Android hybrid environment from personal experience