327 karma · joined November 19, 2017
I'd argue that people shouldn't even buy masks during pandemics and they should be reserved for medical staff who actually need them and know how to use them properly.
But you still have to trust the application that does all this behind the screen to not leak your decrypted keychain or personal credentials. Facebook's messenger app is closed source so who knows that's happening there.
But this is an art project and I have no idea what expertise does the artist have, and I'm not an expert either.
>func eat(food []generic.Type) Or
>func eat(food []g::type) Or something that doesn’t involve adding more <> or ()
I don't understand how this would work with multiple generic parameters. Say I have
func merge(a []g::type, b []g::type) []g::type
How do you specify that a, b and the returned value must have the same type and implement the comparison operators?
Also, why are people trying so hard to stay away from < and >?
Those solutions are not perfect and every time Google implemented them they caused collateral damage or even major changes to the whole platform (see the demonetization situation). I believe that they refrain from using them unless pressured to because fixing a problem that is not know to the general public isn't worth the negative PR, complaints, investigations and the damage to stability of the platform.
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_g... [2] https://developer.palemoon.org/Developer_Guide:Build_Instruc...
I'm curious whether training the network by adding noise and other mutations to the set would make the network more resilient to this attacks. In other words, it's the training set or the network architecture that's vulnerable here?