HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

bodono

242 karma · joined November 20, 2014

submissionscomments
bodono··on The China tea trade was a paradox of global capitalism
"The British forcefully drugged an entire country"

It may be comforting to think in such simplistic black and white terms, but they weren't giving it away for free! Chinese traders gladly swapped tea for opium since there was huge Chinese demand. In fact opium production in China during this time skyrocketed, becoming far larger than imports by the end of the century. You may argue that it was immoral for the British to sell opium into China and I won't disagree, but the real reason Chinese authorities wanted to stop opium imports was simply protectionism (even though it was technically illicit). They wanted to protect the prices of opium produced internally and they were very happy for their own people to be drugged on their own supply.

bodono··on The China tea trade was a paradox of global capitalism
Then immediately says "Tea was traded, directly and indirectly, for Patna opium, Peruvian silver, Caribbean sugar, English textiles and Burmese rice." This article is very confused.
bodono··on Rand Paul says no-knock warrants 'should be forbidden' in wake of shooting
Curious you went all the way back to 2015. Why not go further back to 1940? German police weren't looking too good then. We can all cherry pick data, but often what's left out says more.
bodono··on To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public
Actually both Obama and Clinton had major stories relating to Russia including the failed 'reset', the annexation of Crimea during the Obama administration, obama's "red line" of using chemical weapons in syria which was circumvented by russia, and Obama telling Mitt Romney that Russia was not a threat in the 2012 presidential debates. So yes, they have huge stories relating to russia. And your autocomplete results just bolster the evidence that 'hillary clinton email' has been made a special case and is not organic!
bodono··on To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public
The same thing happens with Russia for "barack obama rus" "hillary clinton rus", "george bush rus", etc. - none autocomplete for me despite the fact that there was lots of news items relating those politicians and russia during their careers. However Clinton is the only one that doesn't appear to autocomplete for email, suggesting that it is specific to her. When I type "donald trump epstei" I get "theo epstein donald trump" (for some reason the word order is flipped), which would suggest to me that epstein is not blocked in the way you suggest, and it's just that not enough people are searching that term, or that the autocomplete algorithm hasn't caught up to the latest news on epstein and trump yet. However "donald trump e j" does autocomplete to "donald trump e jean carroll", which is relating to a serious scandal for the president. This isn't cherry picked I'm afraid, it really does look like intentional blocking of "hillary clinton email" from autocomplete.
bodono··on To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public
They all work fine for me, e.g., 'tom jones emai' -> 'tom jones email', only Clinton didn't.
bodono··on To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public
"stormy daniels" doesn't get any autocomplete results for me even without trump, my guess is this is more about adult search terms getting blacklisted rather than political. For example "donald trump e j" gets "donald trump e jean carroll", E Jean Carroll recently accused Trump of a serious sexual assault and this is autocompleting.
bodono··on To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public
Try "hillary clinton emai". From a fresh chrome session in NYC I get nothing, not a single autocomplete result. On the other hand "donald trump emai" gets:

* donald trump email * donald trump email address * donald trump email list * donald trump email newsletter * donald trump email list signup

And just to drive the point home I tried "root_axis emai" and got "root_axis email". Try anyone else and you get similar results, 'barack obama emai', 'george bush emai', etc etc. So yes, this is proof that the results are scrubbed for Clinton email.

bodono··on U.S. Life Expectancy Drops for Third Year in a Row (2018)
True, but life expectancy is declining here in the UK as well.
bodono··on Cloudflare Network Performance Issues
I'm getting '502 Bad Gateway' on all Cloudflare sites here in London too.
bodono··on The BS-Industrial Complex of Phony A.I.
It contradicts your statement: "it's not as simple as having someone at Hospital X download a pretrained model in Tensorflow and train its last few layers on some CT scans" Because in this case it was as easy as taking a model from a totally different modality and retraining the first (in this case) few layers to accommodate the new device. Furthermore the original training used 15k scans and the retraining only required 152 scans. This is totally reasonable and clear evidence of transfer and generalization. Moreover, even human operators require retraining on new devices!
bodono··on The BS-Industrial Complex of Phony A.I.
This statement is false, as recently demonstrated by DeepMind on retinal scans. Not only did they generalize outside of the training dataset but they were able to use the features learned by the model on an entirely different type of scanning device.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-018-0107-6.epdf?autho...

"Moreover, we demonstrate that the tissue segmentations produced by our architecture act as a device-independent representation; referral accuracy is maintained when using tissue segmentations from a different type of device."

bodono··on US Workers Are Highly Taxed If You Count Premiums
Does well by global standards?! Yes, we should definitely be comparing our healthcare system to those found in places like the Congo. It has bad healthcare outcomes and costs a lot for them, that is bad, don't get hung up on the single word 'garbage', it's called hyperbole.
bodono··on US Workers Are Highly Taxed If You Count Premiums
Yes, emergency treatment is on the NHS but so what? That doesn't mean it's good! Emergency care is better in the US( even if it later bankrupts you). You can routinely wait for 6-12 hours in an emergency room in the UK (admittedly not for truly life-threatening situations). By most metrics, healthcare outcomes in the US are much better than in the NHS, quick google found this: https://qz.com/397419/the-british-seem-less-likely-to-get-ca...

"All private insurance in the UK gives you is that - a nicer environment and quicker access to treatment for non life-threatening conditions."

I don't think you would consider this a small thing if you were one of the 500k people waiting > 6 months for basic treatment on the nhs: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/11/numbers-going-pr...

bodono··on US Workers Are Highly Taxed If You Count Premiums
A good citation can be found in the one you provided:

Under Key findings:

Its main weakness is health care outcomes. The UK appears to perform less well than similar countries on the overall rate at which people die when successful medical care could have saved their lives.

Among its strengths, the NHS does better than health systems in comparable countries at protecting people from heavy financial costs when they are ill. People in the UK are also less likely than in other countries to be put off from seeking medical help due to costs.

So: main strength - cheap, main weakness - health care outcomes!

It's no surprise that fewer people in the UK skip medical care due to costs when it's (close to) free. The problem is that the health care is bad when you get it (according to your own provided document)!

bodono··on US Workers Are Highly Taxed If You Count Premiums
Except for the fact that the NHS is utter garbage and anyone here making 150k is on private health insurance.
bodono··on Oracle’s Java 11 trap
Which language did you pick?
bodono··on LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare
Unbelievably Trump even won overall with white women, he got 53% of that vote.

Source: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14061660/w...

bodono··on Massive Government Report Says Climate Is Warming and Humans Are the Cause
The scientific method means making a prediction based on a theory and seeing if it matches the observed results.

So honest question - have any predictions from climate science about the change in global temperatures come true? Have what climate scientists said ten years was going to happen in ten years actually happened? Global climate dynamics are very complicated and it's very hard to understand, but real science makes testable predictions and then theories are accepted as 'our best theory at the moment' when the observations match predictions within a small tolerance and the theory is thrown out when it doesn't, regardless of how hard or complicated it is.

← PreviousPage 2 of 2