467 karma · joined October 22, 2018
"time command ls -lR --color=always": 12.31 secs
"time command exa -lgR --icons": 11.32 secs
Still, no performance difference on my system. In fact exa seems to be slightly faster (I did the test multiple times and it was alwasy ~1 second faster). This is on a physical HDD and I could hear it churning equivalently on both of the runs.
"time command ls -lR -color=always": 898 millis
"time command exa -lhgR --icons": 638 millis
This is in a directory of roughly 17k files of varying filetypes. Exa also outputs underlines and icons.
---
Admittedly if I create 80000 arbitrary extensionless files "ls" takes around 700 millis while exa takes around 1000 millis, but still the performance difference is nowhere near what you demonstrated.
I don't know what job you're doing that requires "ls"-ing >20k files, but on my system there seems to be no performance penalty before an uncertain, unachievable threshold.
Yes, users can themselves explicitly communicate feedback regarding the product or its features, and no, most of them don't do that. That's why telemetry is useful.
You're not. There may be no correlation between the platform being bad and it being profitable. If it happens to be bad, don't let your career depend upon it, unless it also happens to generate revenue for you.
Are you good?
Yet, before the pandemic there seemed to have been a plethora of articles proclaiming that young people are living paycheck to paycheck more than ever before. So where are those savings coming from?
They can either agree to comply with the orders from up above or they face consequences? How is that hard to comprehend?