bottled_poe

It’s starting to feel like a content whitelist would be easier than a content blacklist.

Actually, probably just the standard expanding universe + light horizon.

Space dust over intergalactic distances seems sufficient to explain Olbers’s Paradox?

ChatCEO

The difference here, which in my opinion the law is yet to catch up with, is the scale of usage enabled by these algorithms.

Unless they have explicitly transferred ownership, then yes. IP generally vests with the creator and is licensed to the recipient unless they have explicitly agreed otherwise.

Seems aligned with what Maslow pyramid of needs predicts. I.e. above a certain safety net, the individual places more value on internal fulfilment rather than external perception of worth.

This seems like a natural outcome of running such a platform. The platform is trying to optimise revenue. They can choose which user complaints to support/reject but they can’t satisfy everyone.

Actually, Fibonacci results can be fairly precisely tested with the golden ratio ratio.

perhaps the question should be: why don’t investors allocate funds for secure software?

Ridiculous. Diagrams are extremely useful for communicating the essential information efficiently. Not everyone needs to spend time going through every line of source code to understand design concepts. I’m really struggling to see how this could possibly be argued otherwise.

This is a great take, but good luck explaining the difference to the majority who are unfamiliar with the technology/mathematics behind it. Most people won’t attempt to understand the difference - and worse they won’t care. It’s just another tragedy of the commons.

> Writing is to a large extent the process of expressing a thought or feeling

Neither of which we believe a machine to be capable of conceiving.

If you want to make a bad argument, pick one aspect of the topic and ignore everything else.

umm.. impacting other peoples lives positively seems like a goal we can all support. Being “smart” seems nebulous at best.

Hmm, that’s a lot of rules to adhere to. I wouldn’t want to miss one. If only there were a linter to ensure these rules were always followed..

Branching factor of two means around 30 hops to visit every star.

Definitely one of the best. I’ve played many many hours of this with and without expansions. Very playable with two, but best with 3 or 4 players - the negotiations between players is where the game really shines.

The question contains contradictory information. I suppose a smarter AI might have worked out the intended meaning, or asked for clarification. But how many humans would?

This seems to be the correct answer based on my experience.

But this is obviously going to caught during code review and seen as an amateur blunder at best.

Maybe at a certain point it just makes more sense to build something new instead of endless iterations.

The engineering trade-offs are paid somewhere, better in an objective space than a subjective one.

The era of strong vs weak typing debate has passed. Adopt strong typing, like a professional, or fade into the 90s web. Harsh but fair.

Is it? Seems to me that most instructions are naturally async or can be refactored as such. I’m probably wrong, just a feeling.

I too would like to know how this is justified.

It’s been a while since I wrote Java, but real time processing was always just a C wrapper with JNI. Maybe it’s changed now?

iOS app? An OS kernel? Anything real-time?

But.. it’s not a good alternative. This description is not as precise or as bounded as the “legalese” wording.

No. Another hard truth is that some jobs are more essential than others.