709 karma · joined October 17, 2013
I'd much rather have any algorithm that gives no power to any parties, and solves a better answer to the question "what is a district for?" (my short short: Local representation for local issues)
As other comments have also noted, lots of people don't want _geographic_ representation but some kind of other issue/identity Proportional Representation. Yup. Also true. My dream State Legislature has a PR Senate at-large across the whole state in batches of 20 or so, and a small-local-district House.
Remote: Yes please!
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Go, Python, AWS, PostgreSQL, C/C++, Java, Javascript, Linux, ...
Résumé/CV: https://bolson.org/resume/
Email: icic@bolson.org
Principal/Architect Software Engineer with 22+ years of experience. Focuses in high performance, high reliability, distributed networks. Comfortable negotiating with stakeholders to design the right solution. Technical leadership of small groups and mentoring junior engineers while also directly contributing to the Software Engineering effort. Design new high performance software from scratch or analyze an existing system and improve its performance.
I want to make things I'm proud of that matter to people and make the world a better place; and I want to solve interesting technical challenges along the way.
Tool for running online rankings/ratings polls. Use for low stakes stuff like deciding what movie to watch, group outing destination, club elections, etc. Can require google/fb login to de-dup votes, or can allow anonymous votes.
Certainly not the Oracle Language (Java)
I like the Google Language (Go) and it's BSD so maybe safe-ish?
I'm not in that ecosystem, but I'd use the Apple language (Swift) if I had to.
Maybe the JetBrains language (Kotlin) is okay?
I hear lots of buzz about the Mozilla language (Rust), maybe they have a good history of open source stewardship.
The Guido language is pretty friendly (Python) ;-)
But I'm pretty done with the Larry language (perl)
CPU and RAM are pretty fast. I do a live-coding interview question and I ask people do to a naive implementation first, then later I ask about possible optimizations. A third to a half of candidates want to do fewer RAM accesses and oh by is that the wrong avenue for this problem - especially when they just wrote their solution in Python and you could get a 10x-20x speedup by rewrite in C/C++/Go/Rust/etc.
Network is IO too. Network is pretty fast, datacenter-to-datacenter, but end users can still have their experience improved with better encoding and protocol; and outbound bandwidth bills can be improved by that too.
They didn’t measure how much value was stolen by rug-pull maneuvers. Did 10,000 ‘fake’ tokens start up, run a while, and rug-pull taking $1 with them? I’d guess that’s just ‘debugging’. Did a few big rug pulls run away with a million dollars? Can we detect _those_ better?
Nothing to do with Hacker News, just Human stuff. I'm just a nerd who has been unlucky in love.
Focus on Condorcet ("Virtual Round Robin") counting. De-duping by requiring a google or facebook login (or anonymous with a crappy hacky captcha).
My best guess solution is a two part legislature, one house of small local districts, one house elected in at-large Proportional Representation.
* The exception was one company that knew it. The attitude was like, "yeah, we're kinda overbureaucratic, but we're gonna be _good_ at it." And indeed, the process slowed down the overall work a bit, but the process was kinda well done and not painful.
But hey, new entrant into the market, keep trying! OnShape is expensive and could use some competition.