Look at these downvotes for disagreements. There's nothing I've said that warrants the downvotes.
3,035 karma · joined April 16, 2008
Look at these downvotes for disagreements. There's nothing I've said that warrants the downvotes.
Solution: shut down the free version. Addressing complaints from free users who demand things captures absolutely zero value when you're a struggling startup with too much else to do and limited resources still trying to make a viable business. Freemium doesn't work unless you're swimming in VC money and only care about user growth, not MRR growth.
http://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=rockmelt#q=rockmelt&c...
They couldn't have paid too much for such a downward trend.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/18/sex-bloggers-coul...
The remaining goal posts by the way are where apps get built first and general app quality. The time that developers move to Android after first making their app on iOS is probably shrinking. The disparity of where apps get made first is also probably shrinking.
Another point about why is Android doing so well: Apple seriously needs to get better at services. They are amazing at hardware, they are great at software that runs on devices, but they have bombed again and again on software that runs as a service in the cloud. This severely limits them. Maps, mobile me, icloud syncing, they have trouble keeping their developer portal up, etc. I believe this is a problem with Apple's culture and what they value. Server software isn't pretty, and it's iterative. That is you bring up something that works, then make it better. Apple's culture is to wow with the first try, but they've been disappointing when it comes to software as a service.
This whole post could have been sarcasm. I know it isn't, but, this is exactly what I never ever want from the computer I use for daily tasks. I just want it to work.
The "Online Inventory Management without the suck" is not a great intro. It stresses an absence of something negative instead of stressing something positive and uses the rather crude and unprofessional word "suck"
You also have no sign-up form visible on first page load and no call to action (one has to scroll a little, at least on my mac).
The "not interested" inversion of "contact us" is also pretty weird and announces that you expect people to not be interested.
The pricing link does not look like a link at all.
Then as you scroll it's just a wall of text all the way to the end.
Are they using something in addition to a spectograph to know this?
It will when you're standing in a courtroom in front of a judge regardless of what's in your book. I'm not saying laws are always right, they clearly aren't, but to build a business on it and then be outraged when it gets shut down?
So either Snowden has incorrect slides, the slides are falsified, or everyone has been lying. Actual evidence of direct access would be better than these slides. I would like someone from Google, Facebook, et al to testify under oath that there is no direct access. Or maybe even the NSA, but we know they share inaccuracies under oath, so maybe that isn't worth so much.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/12/dual_ec_drbg_a...
I don't know if it's in Windows 8 or not.