bufferoverflow

Who cares what Elon says? You can literally try the product and decide. Or you can watch any of hundreds of videos on YouTube or people trying it.

Doesn't work on fiberoptic drones. Doesn't work on drones that use laser/optical comms.

How are they grifters? Tesla gave us FSD to try for free for a month, twice now. If you don't like its performance, don't pay.

Even if you know the location of every single one, you can't easily destroy them. They all have very heavy armored covers. They are probably all guarded by the military.

And there worst part of the triad, ICBMs, can't really be taken out easily by any method I can imagine. And they are nearly impossible to intercept, even by the US.

> I find LLMs extremely useful and still believe they are glorified Markov generators.

Then you should be able to make a markov chain generator without deep neural nets, and it should be on the same level of performance as current LLMs.

But we both know you can't.

> It's the first time ever in European aviation history that an electric VTOL aircraft has taken off non-vertically.

For the first time in history a new revolutionary fusion power plant was demonstrated to run on coal.

Same. Got to the corner of the house, turned around, and got teleported back to the starting point.

I call BS.

Works on my smartphone. That's wild.

I don't understand the pen/physical notebook thing. It's slow to write, insanely slow to search what you've written, almost impossible to copy or share.

We don't know if singularities are even possible. Maybe the universe has some crazy repulsive force when atoms or subatomic particles get really really close (closer than in neutron stars, where atoms are femtometers apart).

So it can be very very wrong.

You're trading correctness for speed.

But how do you classify a question as high vs low complexity? Some seemingly simple questions can turn out to be very very complex. For example, integer solution to

    x³ + y³ + z³ = 42 

took over a hundred years of compute time to find.

Or another seemingly simple equation with positive integers x,y,z

    x/(y+z)+y/(z+x)+z/(x+y) = 4

requires elliptic curve knowledge, and the solution is huge

    x = 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999

    y = 36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579

    z = 4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

(Solution is discussed here: https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-the-positive-integer-s...)

That's the big question. Depends on what policies are implemented and how quickly.

How do they change the phone # and the website of your business?

If AI takes most jobs, the system won't crumble. If anything, the system will probably work much better.

It's the transition period that I am worried about, when large percentages of the population are jobless, but safety nets aren't yet in place.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of Blender developers did and do work for free.

Just because a movie made with it did well, doesn't mean Blender devs get paid.

Different class. Same exact use case.

That's an AI generated image

They didn't even bother to AI-upscale it to get rid of the artifacts

You can buy drugs and defraud rubes with USD too.

Crypto has many different useful applications. One of the main ones: limited supply (I am aware not all crypto has a cap).

I've been using BlueStacks X to run android apps on desktop. Seems to work okay.

In case of kidnapping having your money in a bank won't help you.

1) this is the opposite of elegant. Something that can be expressed in a few clean lines of html + css turned into a wall of barely readable JS, where you have to jump between functions just to find the correct place in the DOM tree.

2) why do you call it "declarative"? This is procedural. React or Vue is more declarative (you declare the state, and it renders based on the state).

You can store your private keys encrypted in a safety deposit box. You can store 3 copies in 3 different banks. It only costs $15-30 per year per box.

In that scenario, if you can't describe what you want with words, a human designer can't read your mind either.

Reread the comment I replied to. It has nothing to do with Anthropic or Google or DeepSeek.

I bet they can hire best minds in the world for a fraction of $3 billion.

But OpenAI already knows every single prompt sent to its models. They don't need to buy Windsurf for that.

It's fast, but it doesn't sound good. Many voice chat AIs are way ahead and sound natural.

That works on humans too.