This is readable... if I zoom in. Might be good for screens that are extremely low-resolution, but large. Maybe something that isn't actually intended to be a screen or something.
Brains do not actually work very similarly to artificial neural networks. The connectionist approach is no longer favored, and human brains are not arranged in regular grids of fully interconnected layers. ANNs were inspired by how people thought the brain worked more than 50 years ago. Of course, ANNs are meant to work and solve practical problems with the technology we have. They're not simulations.
Yeah, its not like the bank gave access to your account to the wrong person and now they're not paying you back. You did something with stuff you legitimately own and control and now you regret it. That's a big difference to me.
Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of the blackout? The point is to force people to use less electricity. All you're doing is cheating the system by stockpiling it before the cutoff.
It really is an indication that someone lacks critical thinking skills. To read satire and never question its validity implies they accepted it uncritically, never asked if it was plausible or reasonable, never thought if the source was trustworthy, never thought to get an independent view. The inability to understand sarcasm and irony really does speak poorly of a person's ability to navigate the world of information overload we live in.
It seems like not a day goes by without someone writing an article about their experiences dealing with well-meaning, but none-the-less insane policies and procedures of the apple app review process.
The airplane was invented by the Wright Brothers, does that mean someone on a flight from Japan to South Korea is bound by US law? I can understand if the SEC said that all compute nodes residing in the United States, and any organization likewise located here is under their jurisdiction. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't argue whether the SEC is legally correct, but it seems absurd to me to claim jurisdiction over an intangible idea whose related productive work occurs all over the world.
That is such a misrepresentation of what I said I think you might have just misread it or something. They should pay for their education with money. If they can't afford medical school, they can take out a loan. That loan shouldn't be a condition of employment payable to your employer. Like I said, either you should get the training yourself or the employer should provide it.
I think functional programmers go too far in insisting how different functional programming is. A typeclass indeed is very similar to an interface in object oriented languages and you can even have default implementations of functions and you can subclass a typeclass (that is, inherit). Its used to solve many of the exact same kinds of problems that OOP classes are. They are fundamentally similar beasts.
I don't think it should be legal to charge employees for training in any form. Either provide it for free, or don't provide it at all. What possible purpose does putting yourself in the middle as both the lender and beneficiary have other than to fascilitate abuse?
I feel bad for this guy. He managed to beat someone way better than himself and now everyone is accusing him of cheating with absolutely zero evidence. What chess engines have done is make everyone paraniod.
Okay, but lets say containers are how we manage applications at scale. And so now you want these containers to still be distributed among regions, among different computers, to be increasingly interconnected, online, to be efficient. Maybe even you want kubernetes on bare metal for extra performance. Lets say that's the trend. Where is it going? Its moving towards grouping together heterogenous hardware in different locations as a single abstraction and managing that. You're going to want to abstract away various forms of memory, processors, GPUs, networking, file systems, and you're going to want something like a task manager, you're going to want to manage permissions and licenses. That is, you want the next layer of abstraction beyond that of a single computer. Docker, virtualization, hyperconverged disaggregated infrastructure - whatever the specific incarnation is, they represent different solutions to the same underlying, long-term trends.
While that has a logic to it, I don't think that's the logic or meaning of the terms as they are generally used in English. If you mean 98% cheaper, say that, not 60 times cheaper. Two times or three times the price means you multiply it by that integer value. For "less" or "cheaper" people use percentages or fractions. Using an integer for cheaper is wrong, IMO.
Because that's what "times more/less" means. 2 times the cost is 200% the cost. Half off is the price times fifty percent (1/2). A sixtieth isn't 60 times anything in any direction.
It makes no sense. 100% cheaper would be free. 60,000% cheaper would imply they pay you the cost of 59 books to take it off your hands. That's quite a sale.
It wasn't the right time yet. Virtualization has only just come to the data center and taken off. People no longer have their single expensive PC, but utilize a multitude of devices. Cloud storage is just making its way onto people's phones and devices. The full suite of VMware products is essentially already a commercially lucrative operating system for the data center / cloud. I think this is a long term trend rather than a fad. Its not the hottest new framework, but rather the culmination of incremental changes over decades. We might not call it an operating system - we'll probably give it a fancier name to generate hype. But the idea is the same none the less.
Could you successfully argue that its generic at this point? I strongly doubt anyone seriously thinks when you talk about Javascript, you're talking about only products and tools made by Oracle.