Saying insane a lot, pretty confident, and cherry picking some text to 'literally' dismiss the entire blog post with a single sentence that just serves to validate your flimsy reasoning doesn't make a good argument.
555 karma · joined May 28, 2015
It's delusional to think software can be flawless in the real world when it's used by an untold amount of people, on all manner of devices, possibly running different OS's with different versions on networks that can be configured all sorts of ways. Thats not to mention all the dependencies involved in creating high level software, from the third party libraries to external services like cloud storage.
You anticipate there will be problems and make sure there are processes in place to manage them when they inevitably occur. Thats the exact opposite of laziness.
Anyway we don't "burn them with fire" or "have heart attacks", we just leave them alone. This strategy has worked out well with humans and spiders co-existing in relative peace.
You can differentiate texture resolutions and polygon counts across platforms. You claim everyone agrees that the PC version is horrible port and has some major performance problems and crashes, but strangely enough it's currently the most played game on Steam.
You say for many many people it's one of the most buggiest games they've experienced at release, yet it hasn't been taken down for sale like Cyberpunk or had its player base disappear like BF2042 or New World.
You continue to make generalised statements like 'many many people', 'all critics', 'everyone agrees' and name random social sites giving the misleadingly impression that everyone agrees with you.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that it looks better then Demon Souls remastered from a PS3 game with reused upscaled textures. Everyone agrees so it's true.
...Sorry but I don't think anything you say is genuine, so there is no point continuing the argument.
People have issues, but everyone saying the PC port is a mess is not true. I have the game on PC and its runs better than most new release games I've played and I've player more than enough of them.
The critic reviews stating PS5 version is the best is baseless, I could say the critic review state the PC version is the best.
Listing some random social site names or pointing out a vocal minority isn't proof of the games graphic quality, I could find 10x more people who would say otherwise.
I recently played Demon souls remake, It doesn't have better graphics.
I asked for details, and now they are provided you can see they are flawed.
And please, stop pretending that you even played the game past 5 minutes and you know what you are talking about.
What you described sounds bizarre and far removed from most peoples experience (mine included) with the game regardless of platform. How exactly do you know what resolution textures are or how many polygons are rendered.
How does that impact the game exactly? If a game does not incorporating the latest features in DX12 or whatever the features Nvidia brings out for its cards, does that compromise the artistic integrity of the game? Does a painstakingly detailed boss with incredible art and fluid animation just not cut it without these graphics settings?
It looks like a mid-2010s f2p Korean MMO? what planet are you on.
I cant believe I replied to this nonsense.
The obvious problem is it’s all based on the negative assumptions that anyway who disagrees with the current path taken must be on ‘their’ side.
You can pretend it’s a magical experience where all parties are teaching and learning and having a wonderful time.
In the real world it’s an inconvenience where one person invades your personal space, hovers over your shoulder on your desk with no space as you awkwardly work through who knows what and establish a pattern of dominance as one person clearly knows more than the other and will just do the work themselves while the other watches OR question every single thing typed to the bemused person at the keyboard. No personal bonds are formed during this intrusive process.
Excessive deliberation over design and breaking down of tasks gives the managers the info they need for the ‘higher up’s’ and the ability to better micro manager there subordinates.
It’s brilliantly sold as a way to assist development, while focusing on the concerns of management.
Like most things Agile, it treats the developer as a child who cant be trusted to get things done. It's grade school where teacher tells you it's time for 'pair programming', yeahhhh. Usually it's at the worse possible time, and it's just another distraction in days filled with distractions that stop you doing anything meaningful.
If people need to work together, they'll do it naturally like any ordinary adults who are asked to complete a task.
Worked at Mcdonalds.. not worth listening to, took a job as a cleaner out of school... don't waste my time. Only people with prestigious employment histories are worth the time of day.