Yes, too late to edit it though.
2,555 karma · joined April 10, 2016
Is data loss less important to you than possible leakage of your photographs?
These are the tradeoffs the GP made choices in.
That would enable content optimized caching for things like IPFS gateways with multiple backend nodes.
* How does a logloss relate to earnings?
* They only receive predictions based on old data (by definition) and not the models, how do they just the predictions them to make trading decisions?
* How can I invest in this hedge fund?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/ARMMP
Unfortunately most mobile devices are not supported by mainline Linux (N900 is best supported, but not fully), usually only server/desktop/laptop vendors have any incentive to mainline their drivers.
http://www.coindesk.com/itbit-exodus-populating-startups-blo...
With static linking, you literally need to recompile everything that uses the library in any form, for every single change. So of there's a security fix in openssl and LibreOffice uses openssl, you need to recompile LibreOffice. If QEMU uses libssh2 which uses openssl, you need to recompile QEMU, even though it doesn't use openssl directly. With Gentoo you just recompile openssl and that's it.
And if there a fix to glibc, you need to recompile EVERYTHING because everything would be statically linked to it.
[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20030207074123/http://www.lindows...
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20040803022103/http://www.suse.d...
"口" = mouth, not crate
"品" is a stack of mouth characters
Another popular option is Synergy (https://github.com/symless/synergy) but I never used it.
According to Wikipedia [1]:
> The term was coined originally in 1973 as a neologism by American writer Norman Mailer to mean a "piece of information that becomes accepted as a fact even though it’s not actually true, or an invented fact believed to be true because it appears in print." Since its creation in 1973 the term has evolved from its original meaning, in common usage, and has assumed other meanings, particularly being used to describe a brief or trivial item of news or information. So it is a factoid that "factoid" means something that is true.
Considering there was no product to bet against the housing market, your options are:
(1) Be a hedge fund manager of a large enough hedge fund to enter a custom derivative contract with a bank, to create the product (which is what those funds that made a ton of money betting against the housing market did)
(2) Have a few million for the minimum to investment in one the said hedge funds
So I'd say the answer for most people is "were too poor".
As a Russian speaker, I find this sentence grating. Is it normal to refer to a ship with a male name as "she"? Would this be right?
> USS George Washington has never seen combat, nor would she be of much practical military use.
(For those that don't know, Russian last names are slightly different depending on the gender. So Admiral Kuznetsov's wife's last name would be Kuznetsova.)