> […] rather than collaborate with the creators.
How do you propose AWS “collaborate” with Elastic or Redis Labs under the terms of the SSPL? Also, who do you believe the creators of Redis are?
862 karma · joined March 23, 2013
How do you propose AWS “collaborate” with Elastic or Redis Labs under the terms of the SSPL? Also, who do you believe the creators of Redis are?
Before you say anything, ask yourself
1) Does this need to be said?
2) Does this need to be said by me?
3) Does this need to be said by me, now?
I have 100 secrets and no hard limit. Now I set the hard limit to $20. What does AWS do?
On iOS 17.4, you’ll be able to see that the divider is thicker and obvious. Long-press on the Safari address bar for an illustrative example. See the gap between “Voice Search” and “Move to Tab Group”?
Which is fine. Put them in a To-Do folder. The original formulation of Inbox Zero suggested three actions:
1. Take care of the e-mail right now. Then archive it.
2. If you can take an action, but not right now, move it to “Follow Up”.
3. If you need someone else to take an action, move it to “Hold”.
It’s _Inbox_ Zero, not e-mail zero. Get the inbox – the place for unprocessed things – empty. Get it empty by processing the things. Then go do something other than e-mail.
It keeps happening.
Because for nearly everyone, that’s all software.
Because it’s a company that makes tunnels. They bore holes in rock. It’s a company that bores – a boring company. It’s nothing more than a stupid pun.
Men wearing steward uniforms frequently hanging around officers do tend to be stewards.
> There is also no indication in the game of who killed John Naples.
Probably the Swedish-speaking man being hauled away from the bloody sword to the lazarette while the captain shouts that he was “twenty years my steward.”
These are not guesses.
Haskell.
> […] obviously paid a PR company to go on an open source charm offensive […]
Please don’t do this here. Consider that others can disagree with you, or that you may simply be wrong.
> Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.
I remember it and still use it, and you should, too. It can be elided in ASP.NET Core, which is the web application framework. Outside of that, there’s no escaping that you have to know what you’re doing.
Good, maybe. Safe, no. Chicken stock is not acidic enough even for water-bath canning – it must be pressure-canned. Anything else is a risk of botulism.
You can use Face ID in the dark.
Isn't the requirement of attribution the consideration in cases like this? Which would make it not gratuitous? Here's open source lawyer and HN user 'DannyBee saying so, for example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14557737
This is speculation presented as news. The confusion certainly appears to be real, but there's no actual investigative reporting.
No, this implementation is difficult to unit test. The rebuttal, “Just make a constructor […]” changes the implementation. The author’s zeal to decry DI frameworks has made him forget for a moment that constructor injection looks the same whether a framework is involved or not.
> [ed] does not have the immediate visual feedback when entering text that even mechanical typewriters have.
…and here’s the counterclaim:
.s/does not have/does have/g
p
It means “young urban professional.”