cmilton

The life I've lived would be my experience. I have had zero direct interactions with any of these enemies. Enemies to the US aren't necessarily enemies to me. Should I be forced to inherit these enemies?

I agree with self defense. However, I'm not sure this is always the case.

>The fault here lies with Congress.

The fault lies with the idea that there always needs to be an enemy.

Thank you. I wholeheartedly agree that it can make things easier. Easy in the short term may not be beneficial in the long would be my only concern.

>I elected the government in large part to protect...us.

Protect you from who?

>I want them to spy on our enemies.

Who are these enemies, and how did we identify them as such? Do we just spy until we found one?

>However, some people (myself included) already have difficulty with this kind of interaction, so ChatGPT here is strictly positive

Do you think this technology is going to make it more difficult for people like yourself?

Just to add an another anecdotal view, here in the US, I have seen more birds than recent years. I attribute the increase in my area to the halting of mosquito spraying practices.

looks like its from 2022

I believe that tech has helped solve food shortages across the world in recent decades. Tech has cured disease. Even recently it helped to develop a vaccine at record speed. Tech has provided internet connectivity for the most remote parts of the world.

That gives me optimism.

>Because the results of the last few decades of tech optimism have been so utterly dismal?

Can you expound upon this a bit? In my view, we have witnessed astonishing progress in tech over the last few decades.

>neo lib deregulation dream

What is your dream?

That sentiment doesn't really bother me. Most of the "current climate" exists within these screens.

Just so we are clear, I am against this premature neutering of technology.

Why do we assume evil? How do our unfounded decisions today affect the possibilities of progress? How easy will it be to repeal these laws when we find the harm they may cause? I would prefer to wait and see.

We all need a reason to be productive. We have placed these jobs above our own well being. That doesn't sound very healthy at all. I would suggest finding something you are passionate about. It may take a while.

Its possible you just picked the wrong career. Time for a change?

>yes, they do want to be oppressed

>being under the boot is safe

Do they want oppression or safety?

I am still unsure how I ultimately feel about the use of these technologies by government. I do believe that people want safety over all, and by most of the statistics I have seen, the UK is somewhat safer than before [1]. Is the government implementing these measures to take advantage of its people or to provide safety for them?

[1]: https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/230-priks.pdf

From the video it seems the individuals on the tugboat are running away from something (around 0:18). Do you think this was part of the plan as well?

> the US pollutes more than anywhere else.

Do you have a source for this claim? In my limited searching China exceeds the US in pollution. My sources could be biased, so I would be happy to take a look at yours.

Yes, anything we do not agree with should go away entirely.

I do not agree with throwaway accounts. They should go away entirely.

You are being just as "toxic" in your motives.

Who\What is deciding who these "people whose only goal is to be assholes to others or to spread disinformation" are?

I think most would agree that more is better than fewer caretakers. This works well when families are located close geographically, but not so much when spread out.

I would also argue, why does the community automatically bear the responsibility for a decision made by two?

What do you think it is?

One of the downsides to have a device for both personal and business use with no easy way to separate the two.

Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcome?

How is peak load defined in a hospital? (I assume you mean patients. I apologize if that is incorrect.)

You asked for documentation of legal holds. Pardon me for interpreting that as such and providing a link to Google’s legal hold documentation.

It sounds like you are looking for the laws “that requires google to hold the data for this particular topic.”

How would the LLM be trained with information she wouldn't divulge?

Correct.

What if the private company is Visa or Mastercard? What if it is your only ISP?

Thank you for that. I appreciate your conversation about the content of his article rather than the content of his character.

Like others, I have no idea who Sivers is.

What do you think about losing every debate?