Sure might increase the ods of a battery catching fire, or reduction in battery life. But if you're trying to get the fastest time...you might not care
2,226 karma · joined April 19, 2013
Sure might increase the ods of a battery catching fire, or reduction in battery life. But if you're trying to get the fastest time...you might not care
Tesla is still far from that. I've yet to meet a tesla owner who's car just "Works" without any issues or fiddling.
GM's & Nissan's EVs fit that bucket. But they are designed as "buget" cars and dont evoke a desire from buyers to be excited about them on a day-to-day basis.
The Public Cloud provides a monthly expense that just becomes part of the operation budget.
It's exciting to think about the innovation to government services as an end-result.
The implications from a chip this powerful, with its low-wattage, heat dissipation...will enable the next generation of laptop form factor.
Or they can go through a 3rd party consultant to take care of it so they can focus their cycles on more important issues.
Not everyone is an infrastructure provider. Time is a limited commodity, and there are clear benefits of spending as much of your time on the core business.
Say there's 10,000 of these in space, that's 200,000Gibps or 195Tibps.
I don't think that's enough bandwidth for high speed internet for hundreds of millions of customers.
However I suspect it'll be cheaper and faster for sparsley populated areas. With Urban areas still leveraging physical wires.
So why would YT block it?
Because of the redesign, i decided to try out Apple Maps before attempting to re-install Google Maps.
Have yet to re-install google maps since, with Apple Maps actually much improved.
Just California has Prop 13 protections for land owners.
A lot of credit goes towards the police relationship - https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/02/how-east-palo-alto-sh...
East Palo Alto is a shining example of how a township/city can clean up its streets in a short time period, by investing in the community.
SF = 2018 was 690.89 per 100,000 population EPA = 2018 was 470.14 per 100,000 population
Src: EPA = https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/us/ca/east-palo-alto/crim... SF = https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/us/ca/san-francisco/crime...
https://9to5google.com/2020/09/30/android-tv-replaced-google...
I generally keep my TV much longer than I keep a laptop/computer.
How is this different?
Not saying the cuts need to come from that segment, but let the sheer size of some of these budgetary items sink in.
Just me, or is it crazy they haven't had 1 year of profitability in nearly 3 decades of operations.
I'm curious what the statistics are for a family remaining wealth over a long period of time.
Even with wealth evenly split between each generations kids, given a growth of just 4% it might end up with each generation getting a greater amount of wealth still.
In the past large familes prevented this, but if the average extremely wealthy person only averages 2 kids. The dilution through children just doesn't occur.
I'm not needing a taxi/uber/lyft for leaving the bar. I'm not going out to a restaurant with friends. I'm not traveling for work/fun and needing an lift to the hotel.
My usage of uber/lyft/taxis went from 100s per month down to 0. If this change happened in 2019, I'd of had significant changes to my daily routine. Today, this changes nothing.
1 rolling black out every 20 years isn't all that crazy. Would you rather we spend billions/trillions on infrastructure used for 3 days every 20 years?