> We don't know how this data is being used
what can possibly go wrong ? or just paranoid ?
1,475 karma · joined July 22, 2017
what can possibly go wrong ? or just paranoid ?
Honestly hearing this complain about zoom for the first time. I have never seen anyone complain about quality of meet or the interface (more than a 100 people from different teams).
If it feels strange. Hire that guy, pay his salary and split 100/0.
I really miss the yahoo openhack.
Just tag commands with a # at the end
> $ complex command here # tagHere
Later use the tag with ctrl+r
I do this all the time
> ssh 127.0.0.1 # master
Tennis would also have some part of mind games right ? The more I think about it, obviously it definitely is a matter of body excellence, but if you can always predict where your opponent going to hit, wouldn't that be a sure win (considering the players equal in matter of body)?
I don't see any "reaction time" available in RPS (considering equal in matter of body), and no way to predict the choice of the other one (as you stated) so similar to coin toss (you can't influence the choice of the opponent).
Poker also gives you some amount of time to "react" to what others did. So I am still seeing RPS heavily biased towards luck.
edit: wait something looks odd at http://www.worldrps.com/ , is it really an internationally recognized competition ?
I think what we want to look at is how much luck/skill percent is there. If tennis was luck overpowering skill, it wouldn't be an international sport in my opinion.
So rock paper scissors is 90% luck + 10% skill. A kid can potentially beat a professional rock player. Same is not the case for tennis.
> the sense of observation or the putting in place of a strategic sequence
The court can ask him to defeat 10 other people in that game consistently to prove that ? But then he could argue the others were also skilled ?
Release notes are usually for people who are already using it.
Request to please start release announcements by saying what really a "Network Block Device (NBD) server" is. Don't assume that people are familiar with every possible piece of software already.
I think this is correct. The curve flattens with age (in my opinion).
> you saw a few exception
I think the seniors you met (the knowledgeable ones) /were/ the exceptions. Most seniors I have seen have convinced themselves that they know all there is to know.
Yeah I actually realized that mistake some 30 mins after posting that I think but then left it like just wondering who will notice that :p
Have you met me ?
> High request volume (over 2,000 requests per day)
What ? or do you mean free version is restricted to 2000 req per day
edit: wasn't this a "reverse geocoding api" 5 days ago, and something else 6 days ago ?