compass_copium

good

It looks very nice. It's a nifty project. However, as the particular kind of weirdo who has a bookmark to https://globe.adsbexchange.com/ on his phone's desktop and checks it multiple times daily, I will point out that this UI doesn't add much that the color-coded plane icons on ADS-Bx don't already do, and it is more difficult to quickly visually glean information from.

Shouldn't your client have no problem saving a chat history? It is, by definition, able to read every message you send and receive.

What a quality car manufacturer!

Nonsense.

A QC operator may be able to carry out a test with as much accuracy (or perhaps better accuracy, with enough practice) than the PhD quality chemist who developed it. They could plausibly do so with a high school education and not be able to explain the test in any detail. They do not understand the test in the same way as the chemist.

If 'understand' is a meaningless term to someone who's spent 30 years in AI research, I understand why LLMs are being sold and hyped in the way they are.

Possibly training flights; they will often do racetrack shapes like that for long periods to maintain proficiency with the aircraft type.

>The headline overstates the finding.

On a long covid news article? What are the chances!

or breaking numpy by importing your api key from a little file you wrote called "secret.py" :P

Zenni sells one now, with privacy as a selling point

Hmm, I remember reading that the Soviets had significantly better preparations for civilian protection in nuclear war than the US (including more bunkers in cities), but I'm struggling to remember where. Possibly Raven Rock (subtitle: The Story of the U.S. Government’s Secret Plan to Save Itself–While the Rest of Us Die) by Garrett Graff.

It's not very nuanced analysis to say the Russkies don't give a fuck and focus only on them when their enemies (who wanted them annihilated) tested more bombs and directly killed civilians in war with them.

Those dirty commies... American testing had absolutely no consequences for its own citizens or others.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Tooth_Survey

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikini_Atoll

ed Master when?

BSA made the decision to allow girls on their own and it's been fantastic for the program.

This is much cleaner--35 /ppb/.

Really irresponsible and bad journalism.

DDoS the hell out of any IP address running an AI scraper bot

If someone makes a SETI@Home style daemon I'd contribute my home internet to this worthy goal

Indeed, there are two on the back of the kart...

Is there a legitimate reason for them to forward paypal emails? Why not just not let that happen under any circumstances?

Looks to be the plan.

For low-wage employees who spend almost all of their income on goods and services, yes.

For highly compensated employees who save the majority of their money, no.

Yes, but they can get the same effect by buying military hardware--and that has the added benefit of making Raytheon management and shareholders richer. When you just directly pay an employee with government money, there's no way to do that!

I will! It's nature's sweetener, I've always said :)

The point is not that you are eating dirt. The point is that you are constantly surrounded by small amounts of things that are not good for you. Take a plane? Eat a banana? You are exposed to radiation. Drink water in certain parts of the country? You are exposed to small amounts of uranium. Is any of that good? No, but it's unavoidable to be exposed to small amounts of naturally occuring toxins and it's not worth worrying about.

It's only "alarming" because it's presented in an alarmimg way. If the headline had said "Protein powders found to contain 2.5% as much lead as undisturbed dirt" you would not have found it alarming.

No, it does not.

>plants actually take up very little lead in their stems and leaves, and are safe to eat

They might have, for instance, lead on the level of 1 ppm, which poses no significant harm to your health.

Nope, just an analytical chemist who's worked in 3rd party testing labs.

Yes. There's also no world where you don't take up miniscule amounts of toxic, naturally occuring chemicals.

Twice the P65 level is 1 ppm lead. That translates to 35 micrograms per serving.

Lead is a naturally occuring element. Clean dirt contains 15 to 40 ppm lead.

You grow plants in dirt. Guess what happens? They take up a little bit of lead. Ideally I would like to eat 0 micrograms of lead, sure, but I'm not worried about tiny unavoidable amounts of lead from my food.

>It's possible that Windows 11 with its TPM requirement may finally force a hardware upgrade of those dinosaurs but I read there are hacks to get around that.

This is what killed a lot of computers in my company's laboratories.