comradesmith

The fact you’ve got to learn them doesn’t negate the statement that they communicate without words.

All language has to be learned

I don’t understand your comment. Can you spell it out for me?

These aren’t actually from the game…

I’ll deal with that problem when it happens

It’s probably just that more people are looking at the trinity site because of said historic significance

This is cool, I’m going to try write my own implementation to follow along as a learning exercise

It’s fun. You should try playing it instead of judging by heuristics.

1. Make tests 2. Commit them 3. Proceed with implementation and tell agent to use the tests but not modify them

It will probably comply, and at least if it does change the tests you can always revert those files to where you committed them

I really don’t see the connection. A$AP isn’t a noob

Code is rusty ankles and ashy kneecaps.

I believe the article reached the same conclusion you did

You’re right. I’ll setup the database. Everyone can trust me, honest!

> Cleartext signatures considered harmful

Really? To me it seems that what’s really harmful is assuming a long string of high entropy hex bytes is a valid signature.

Both detached signatures and cleartext need to be run through verify, so what gives?

Does gpg not error when the post-verification output file doesn’t match the cleartext? That sounds like a bug in gpg

Thanks, I’ll try this :)

You can’t separate layout and design from typeface selection.

But yes I agree content must come first. Typeface probably comes second!

Holy fuck they actually built Smart Pipe[1]

1: https://youtu.be/DJklHwoYgBQ?si=bSRE2lOqwwm1Q_D9

That is so incredibly rude of you. Science communication to the general public is valuable.

Let’s not forget that the author is a person too, just cause you don’t like it doesn’t mean you’ve got any place to talk down on them.

Yeah, but the vibes are the same as basalt textiles

I like this perspective :)

They said don’t __just__ use never, and explain that as meaning you should give an alternative with every “never” clause, which is what their example does :)

Yeah, but they know how to make money

The better they support the free side, the better the conversion rates will be. So I think the incentives align with both free and paying customers

They didn’t change anything about the software you bought? It still functions like it did the day you bought it.

Pretty bold claim. Do you have bold evidence?

Yeah I get the feeling everyone is talking about the AI stuff, but the majority of the launch talks about the actual _software_ they’re launching, and I really like it.

I’m happy for AI subscribers to subsidise my experience ;)

Thanks for the article. What about using file reads from a mounted ramdisk?

Cause one is a formatter and the other is a package manager. That shouldn’t be hard to understand.

Carry the camera with you through your daily life.

I think it’s better for developers to not have conflicting system distributions.

Though for a while there having built in interpreters was great for kids and learners.

> You might say that doing such a little operation becomes easier after being more familiar with containerization—I’m sure that’s true, absolutely.

If you admit this, then why do you go on to write against docker in such an authoritative tone?

I don’t think you understand docker.