501 karma · joined January 24, 2009
Another way to research a documentary about privacy, or lack thereof, would be to go do a bunch of interviews with detectives, police, and DB admins at Tesco. Yawn. This guy chose to live the experience of trying to hide - he's not pretending to be a spy, he's pretending to be spied on. As another commenter said, this is his job, it's how he supports him family.
The video mentions (4'18") that the same team studied another guy, mechanical engineer Mr Manek, who survives only on boiled water: "They conclusively proved that Mr Manek did indeed survive on nothing but water and cosmic energy". I wonder how they did the cosmic energy bit?
Maybe 'scary' was a bit strong - I'm not exactly trembling under my bed ... yet.
This is the bit that scares me.
Rebelling against self-destructive authoritarianism == sexy, no matter what you call it.
http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychall...
Hailing from the Emerald Isle, I find it embarrassing how many of these books were banned in Ireland.
What is the meaning of "pirated" here? Are they going to sue militants for copyright infringement?
Would it be considered gambling?
For the buyer, or the seller? :) It sounds a bit closer to MLM than to gambling ...
Their development employs many bureaucrats, consultants and contractors and their expenditure supports an even larger number of people throughout society.
... by the same argument I should stroll around the city and burn some cars, thereby offering employment to many firefighters, car producers, actuaries and all their suppliers.
The point about ever-expanding bureaucracies is well noted however. Perhaps it is our duty to design really bad programming languages and methodologies, to sell them to government organisations and similar bureaucracies in order to drive their likelihood of success even lower. Reminds me of the true purpose of Ada ... http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/sigplannotices/gigo-1997-0...
Oscar Wilde claimed "life follows art". I guess he wasn't thinking of the transformative power it could have over millions of lives, and might have debated whether soaps are "Art".
Who wants to watch soaps about pious mothers-of-8? Our choice of role-models is about who we want to become, and perhaps one of the success factors for TV is that it offers poor people a vision of The American Lifestyle ... something to aspire to (at least from their perspective). On the other hand, I've never figured out why anybody watches Coronation Street, a half-hour banging my head on the wall would be better spent.
A soap character who's beautiful, charming, popular, wealthy, witty, racist, xenophobic, homophibic, antisemitic could be a very dangerous thing indeed. If TV becomes a tool for manipulating culture, it could get nasty in the wrong hands.
And I would be scared of a business ethics committee deciding which companies are allowed to run. It would be worse than the App Store.
Apparently, these things almost eliminate spillage. The Urinal Fly is a similar concept, much simpler, but not so much fun imo.
I think there's no end to the amount of fun humans can invent. One day, every large company will have a VP of Fun.
"Our aim is to keep this bathroom clean. Your aim would be appreciated"
- notice in my grandmother's bathroom.