(Note to downvoter: I say this because he's notorious for peppering his feel-good rants with factual inaccuracies)
912 karma · joined November 9, 2009
(Note to downvoter: I say this because he's notorious for peppering his feel-good rants with factual inaccuracies)
I suppose the time when people could do that is at earliest, the most recent of those incidents.
You'd be required to remove it - like you're sometimes required to remove a belt, or boots, or anything with metal in it for that matter.
One can't blame companies for being a bit protective of their timetable data. If this kind of data escapes into the wild there's a genuine risk of what is known in the biz as 'having more customers'. When this happens there's a whole knock on series of problems that the companies need to deal with, not least of which is 'working out what to do with all the extra money'.
I think perhaps this chap didn't consider these factors when he cooked up his little application. Will he be stumping up to repair any tracks that get worn out earlier due to increased passenger numbers? I think not.
Look, the way I see it, WP7 is barely months (weeks?) old. To expect HTML5 support when 'HTML5' is in still flux is silly. MS are still working on their desktop support for goodness sake.
Lack of copy-and-paste demonstrates clearly that MS couldn't get everything in to v1.0. And to impute strategic motives is reaching.
(http://techie-buzz.com/tech-news/using-chrome-for-hotmail.ht...)
What's the problem again?
http://timworstall.com/2010/10/28/dodgy-statistics-here-very...
"Thanks largely to Apple themselves, we live in a world where we have digital music, photos, movies, and TV shows that take up dozens, if not hundreds of gigabytes of storage."
Ah nope. Fawning, not trolling.
He forgot to add indoor plumbing, the internal combustion engine, modern medicine, etc, to the list.
I've only ever lived in houses with the big uglies.
All lightbulb headaches have been due to IKEA and their foreign ways.
ISTM a virtual 'locked container of documents' would have the same legal status.
I'm not sure why so many techies go down the Walter-Mittyesque 'Enemy of the State' route when discussing this sort of thing. Mention the police in conjunction with encryption and suddenly everyone's a paranoid compound-dweller...
Let's be clear here - it is unlikely that this guy is making a stand for paranoid techies - it is much more likely that he's got pics and videos on his HDD of kids getting raped that he doesn't want the police to see.
It's not that new an idea. I tend to lose a teeny bit of respect for people who fall for it.
No-one is going to say "I'm not setting up a Windows machine just to test a niche browser like IE. Screw that".
Herself, not so much.
They're trying to sell Windows licenses. They have no reason to sweat to make a hardware accelerated IE work on OSX, I'm baffled that people think it'd make sense for them.
And the idea (by extension) that any app that works with standards-based content should be cross-platform is barmy.