355 karma · joined July 24, 2024
Next you're going to tell me the Moving sofa problem isn't really about moving sofas!
Or would you like to talk about the long term results from actions of unions last year?
Source?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/014829...
It has been long regarded as pseudoscience
> unbiased courts
You say this as something could ever exist. A court will always have a bias because it is humans with values and morals that make a decision. Think about the classic "would you steal bread to feed your family", or even the trolley problem, or as a very concrete example the recent overturning of Roe v Wade in America (keeping in mind that both sides of that discussion reveal an implicit bias based on your starting set of morals and values). Any question that involves a base set of values and morals will never have an unbiased answer.
> Uncensored, tunable LLMs under the full control of their users could scour the internet for propaganda, look for connections between people and organisations and just generally make the work of propagandists who don't have their reader's interests in mind more difficult.
Even this example, what sources do you trust that is or is not "in the readers best interest", what is propaganda or what is an implicit value in a society, when you tune an LLM does that just mean you're steering it to give answers that you like more?
Creating an unbiased LLM is as much of a fools errand as creating an unbiased news publication