[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Psychopathy_Checklist
409 karma · joined September 3, 2013
Contact @ concepthacker dot com
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Psychopathy_Checklist
Maybe BlackBerry should attack the problem the same way Coke did, by conducting a (longer-term) OS interface challenge.
[1]http://www.slate.com/articles/business/rivalries/2013/08/pep...
I have a Blackberry Z30[1] and I don't think I could go back to the "old way" of using a smartphone. BB 10 feels like a true smartphone experience, as subjective as that is.
[1] http://ca.blackberry.com/smartphones/blackberry-z30.html
For example, didn't Obama promise to close Guantanamo Prison? http://www.npr.org/2013/01/23/169922171/obamas-promise-to-cl...
There's countless examples of fraud, complacency and bias in scientific research, but I'll just quote the wise (albeit fictional) Jedi Master Yoda: "Do, or do not. There is no try." Especially when the fate of sentient life hangs in the balance.
Moreso, the number of retractions has grown over tenfold in the past decade - but it's only 0.2% of the 1.4 million papers published in academic journals. The studies that were retracted were only done so when fundamental flaws were exposed by others. Many more false studies go on unnoticed and continue to be referenced.
Worse of all, 90 percent of drugs that were "successfully" tested on animals then failed in human trials.
EDIT: It should be a criminal offence for researchers to subject animals to harm and death and produce fraudulent papers.
Sources: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-t...
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/how-get-rid-animal-tes...
If you need/want the cards, email me. I'll send them to you free.
Also consider the possibility you are entering a midlife crisis. Don't laugh. It can really mess with your head.
Malcolm Gladwell may be too popular to be 'cool', but he's a master storyteller. Haters gonna hate.
Why don't you read a real book instead of learning from YouTube celebrities? Learn the truth.
When we harm or show an incorrect appreciation for other sentient beings, it shows not only disrespect and lack of understanding and compassion, but it diminishes human dignity.
[1] http://m.livescience.com/22178-parrots-reason-three-year-old...
[2] http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/researchers-say-mice-feel...
[3] http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-07/squint-if-it-h...
[4] http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/06/when-doves-cry-scientific-a...
[5] http://news.discovery.com/animals/birds-hold-avian-funerals-...
Killing animals may still be acceptable in western society, but it's wrong. It's wrong just as slavery in the United States in the 18th and 19th century was once acceptable but wrong. Just as hanging, drawing and quartering to an audience of thousands in Europe was acceptable but wrong.
To disregard the pain and suffering of animal persons without regard for their interests - just because they're not human, is a form of racism. Peter Singer[1] calls it 'speciesism'.
We don't need technological advances in this society as much as we need advances in morality.