http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://...
1,796 karma · joined December 13, 2013
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://...
The hosted version of Ghost is amazingly simply to use. Sign up and publish. Done. The download and self-host is a bit more difficult, but nothing any tech-savy person shouldn't be able to figure out.
To me, the simplicity of Ghost is the best feature and trumps any missing features.
Also amazing how small the components (LED dies) are.
Taxing consumption already occurs: For example, if you drive a car you pay the gasoline tax and therefor pay more than a person who doesn't drive a car (who doesn't have to pay for fuel). Similarly, sales tax. The more you buy, the more tax you pay.
In regards to this article, the title is a bit misleading. It notes a server glitch, but only talks about this server side problem in the last 2 paragraphs.
> "According to the CPSC, the issue can be repaired with an automatic update when the device is connected to a wireless network and linked to a Nest account."
Further, they "fixed" this issue by disabling Nest Wave. Now you have to hit the button to disable an alarm, just like any existing smoke detector.
Based on the video, can you run any shell/bash script you can think of? And does this have logging built in?
> Yes, Liftmaster/Sears/Craftsman have similar products. I propose mine as an add-on to existing systems in a more universal way. Plus, nothing wrong with a little competition (although the tech world these days hates it).
> Opening or closing your door could be useful if you left the house and forgot, or a friend is coming over, or a contractor to do some work. This is noted below as well.
> As for security, the backbone communication system is designed to communicate device <-> server via https. So there is some security there. We are working very hard on this to implement something very strong.
> Schedules will work regardless if the network is up or down. These are synced anytime the network is up, but the device runs them as needed. No internet needed.
> If something is below the door, than you would have the same issue as if someone pushed a remote button. The laser sensor may or may not be tripped, and the door-load (how much force to close) may or may not be tripped. Nothing Portal can do here.
> In regards to the setup. No, it is not "zero"...fixed the website. As for 5 minutes, absolutely. The trigger is simply another wired remote, two wires. The sensor is prewired and just needs to be placed. No soldering, building circuit boards, etc.
> Yes, if the Portal service/servers or the internet connection is down in between, Portal will not work. It is meant to be an add on to RF remotes. However, we do provide a default website on the device with a PIN code for activating the door. Currently, its not so polished as it isn't the main focus. But needless to say, it works.
> If someone gains access to your phone, than yes they could open/close your garage. Just like losing your car remote. You could always log out of the app.
> Portal is a product and a service. Nest like model: buy the hardware, the software does not have a monthly fee.
In other news, Amazon is a surprise. Then again, it is a surprise (head scratcher) that they still do not use https everywhere. Snapchat on the other hand is....snapchat. Nothing is gone forever this day in age.
Snapchat (almost bought by FB) for $3B, zero revenue.
And who is to govern the rates (and tiers) of faster speeds? I can only assume ISPs will determine a cost based on aggregate bandwidth. But who is to say there can't be a fast lane, a faster lane, and a fastest lane? Sounds anti competitive to me (even the big name companies are against this!).
Last: "The telecom companies argue that without being able to charge tech firms for higher-speed connections, they will be unable to invest in faster connections for consumers" > Google Fiber is cheaper for one. Seconds, the telecom giants have all increased subscriptions so there is more money there. And, as time goes along shouldn't these providers become more efficient and costs should decrease anyway? Must be nice to have a sudo-monopoly in some markets.
Kind of like the Oculus buy by FB, they have the money...spend it!
Also a tough time for a tech company to go public since the general marketplace seems pretty overpriced as it is these days. The fact that Alibaba is an established business with history should help it perform well on IPO day.
Sorry, but there seems to be a lot missing from the site considering we are talking about backing up DBs.