in any case the bell was tolling for valleywag...there just isn't that much dirt in the bay area to dish on...i never knew how people managed even the contrived level of interest that valleywag generated
172 karma · joined November 3, 2008
in any case the bell was tolling for valleywag...there just isn't that much dirt in the bay area to dish on...i never knew how people managed even the contrived level of interest that valleywag generated
my guess is that they only cling to life on support contracts from people who are still solaris/sparc shops (which i imagine they are still quite a few of)
fb should consider a nominal monthly fee for advanced features (a la flickr). my guess is that the service has become sticky enough to turn the screws ever so slightly on users. barring a subscription, i don't see them ever making a lot of money....unless they just go to a cpm model and advertisers just give up on clickthrough
ten years from now, you will be dealing with a multicore world, and you will be using something that is conceptually tied to haskell. i see this as inevitable.
factor i have looked at again and again, worked through some trivial problems...not sure i will ever "get" it. i would brute-force understanding it were it to take off.
BINGO
all that money being printed now with reckless abandon, and the tens of trillions more we will print as the boomers retire...its gotta chase something...it will chase commodities through the roof. oil will go to $500. your weekly grocery bill will be over $1000. now's a great time to stockpile the black stuff before it goes crazy. it will be amusing watching futures traders get gutted as they open up shorts on oil futures presuming it will keep falling...
ultimately we will get hyperinflation as the govt prints literally trillions to monetize the various debts of the govt. the strong dollar now is just a head fake as the yen carry trade and other various forex arbitrages unwind.
all real estate will lose 50%. everything. that is what happened in japan in the 90s...even desirable tokyo condos lost 50%. 50% will be the minimum downside for real estate.
actually its worth noting that when japan went down the toilet in the 90s, they were the world's biggest saver and lender. we are the world's biggest borrower. so don't expect anything as gentle as japan's ten-year recession.
expect an end to all of this around 2020, and this will only end when people see taking on debt, any debt, as about as attractive as sharing needles with a junkie. when this is over its impossible to say what the economy will look like, but you can be sure people will be dealing in tangibles...cash or barter.
the best thing you can do now is -preserve capital-. you are going to need it to survive. forget the charlatans telling you to "double down" because they have some anecdotes of companies exploding out of temporary down times....none of your luminaries have lived through anything like this, and indeed many of the superstars of the roaring twenties were literally gutted by the market turmoil of the 30s...they just refused to believe the downside would last very long, they thought it was all just a buying opportunity...little did they know how far things would fall.
don't get me wrong, i like clojure, but it won't be better for multicore until the jvm is better for multicore
a program compiled for a multicore CPU will RUN. the question is how OPTIMALLY does it run. a program with no potential for parallelism will not get any parallelism. it will run, but run slow compared to programs designed for parallelism.
programs written to exploit parallelism will be programs that bring new approaches to data and state. functional languages provide this today, which is why lots of people think they will be the way forward for multicore.
honestly i think you are just bordering on being a troll. why don't you do some reading on this topic before writing more uninformed replies
then stop spouting off uninformed comments about how processes are scheduled
The Rails applications themselves don't need to be altered to run in a multi-core environment.
nor do any other program compiled for that architecture. its the OS that schedules processes, not your userland program. the point is, some programs can be written in a way that makes it easier for the OS to exploit multicore. since ruby is not a functional language, my guess is that it would tend to not help the kernel exploit these resources. but obviously in the worst case, a process can run inside one core and never get the advantages of the rest of the chip architecture. this is about exploiting multicore
Got it?
yes, i get that you know very little about how computers function
then you clearly aren't buying new high-end servers for data crunching either, because these are already multicore
it will be. you're getting beaten over the head by chip designers telling you that your future cpu is going to consist of a (possibly large) array of processing cores with a high-capacity bus connecting them. they are telling you this is the only way they can give you higher performance. you had better start believing them because these systems are starting to get delivered now.
A great example of that is Rails, when set up with mongrel processes, each of which can run on its own core if necessary
?????? so mongrel comes with its own OS kernel that has better support for multicore than linux and freebsd? wow!! coolzzz!
that is because you have slept through the entire revolution of share-nothing concurrency
its possible that VCs can't assemble the level of funding needed to attack the energy market (for example)...these investments will have to scale out to the hundreds of billions with very long time horizons for returns. most likely this stuff will have to get federal funding, and much of it already does from nsf, doe, darpa, etc
there are a few best practices to scaling, you can find those archived at places like highscalability etc...but in the end you just need hardware. hardware buys you fault tolerance, test environments, sharding, blah blah blah. if you are looking to meet this traffic on your own box or on a vm-hoster, forget it
carbon fiber?? why not try to see if you can freeze-frame star trek iv at the point where scotty has his forumla for transparent aluminum on the screen. that should catch a cool $5k per unit at least.