I'm not. You vastly underestimate how much easier that is to read, especially for students in school.
273 karma · joined December 31, 2018
I'm not. You vastly underestimate how much easier that is to read, especially for students in school.
What you're forgetting is that insurance companies still need their custom insurance software with all of their custom risk models built in. That's the entire value proposition of the business so your estimate that it's only "0.5%" of what the company needs is way off.
This motivation is asinine. Record leaks don't do anything to harm the original records and it's not like Marriott's secret sauce is a list of customer records. Companies don't protect assets from things that don't cause the assets harm.
Personal data does not have value to the company in that regard. It's a liability more than an asset.
If your mental model relies on them choosing fossil fuels over money, it’s wrong.
It’s similar to native Hawaiians. Despite significant effort, that culture is being drowned by tourists and the massive non-native population influencing them. Sure, you can celebrate the culture and the language, but it doesn’t even begin to give you a glimpse of what it could have been without European invasions.
The free market argument would be to let Apple do what it wants with its products. A “competition commissioner” is antithetical to that.
any US government? Do you understand that many state-level governments are proportionally representative?
Cool, but that has nothing to do with industry bias. This same phenomenon is shown by enrollment rates at university in CS.
I assume Asian men are actually "white men" for the purposes of your example?
Similar to how it behaved during the gold-backed dollar era. "Money shortages" were a thing often leading to market corrections during the early 1900s. This book references it several times: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reminiscences_of_a_Stock_Opera...
Yes they will. Hyperbole is unnecessary and harmful when the real projected outcomes are already bad enough.
>If the price were to include a carbon tax, it would likely be at least ten times higher and we would very quickly get rid of our beloved gas guzzlers.
10x is highly unlikely. At 450kg of CO2 per barrel and even $50/ton of CO2 offset costs that’s about $25 additional per barrel, which puts it at a lower cost than the 2007 era peaks.