228 karma · joined March 10, 2014
That's a business decision made by Tesla, not victimisation of poor old Elon, whatever the Musk fanbois think.
Good luck fitting a switch to a handgun dating before 1919, which in theory can be held - although you'd struggle to get a license because you can only hold antique handguns if ammunition isn't readily available for them in the UK, you are a bona-fide collector and central government don't object - they have to individually approve all such licenses.
As you seem to be struggling, I'll simplify it as much as I can for you. The situation that's causing concern in Canada can't happen in the UK because it's illegal to own that sort of weapon in the first place.
That means our laws are stricter than those in Canada.
That means Canada's laws are weaker than those of at least one European country.
That means you are wrong.
Still wrong. In the UK, for example, it's virtually impossible to own a handgun of any sort. The info is easily available online.
It certainly would, as it's not true.
And you can step up a level above in the same ecosystem as well, my current project is written in Scala and directly shares its data structures with the Graal Python interprer that I've embedded inside it, so other people can write the stuff they want in Python.
As pointless benchmarks seem to be the thing, here's the numbers for different flavours of the one from the article with "10 20 30 40 50" as the args to make it a teeny bit more realistic:
C 27sec
Java 39sec 1.4x C
GraalPy 139sec 5.1x C
PyPy 252sec 9.3x C
CPython 1780sec 66.3x C
Not that this will tell you much about real-world use cases, of course, but hell, it's Friday afternoon...
And:
"Python is by far the fastest to write, cleanest, more maintainable programming language I know ... I rarely feel Python slows me down, and on the other side I constantly marvel at how fast I code with it compared to other languages."
In other words, "I don't know much about anything else other than Python."
What a pointless article.
Audi first offered matrix LED headlights in 2013, so it's only taken Tesla a decade to catch up.
Inexperienced people use complex solutions because they think if the experienced people use it, it must be the right thing to do, no matter what the scale is.
Always use the simplest thing that will work.
"Although Channel Files end with the SYS extension, they are not kernel drivers."
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/technical-details-on-todays...
Abbreviations and punctuation should not be used unless they appear in the designated name, e.g. “Dr Newton’s Way”. Only single spaces should be used.
And it also works with over-reflective road signs, they too get a dark box.
If so, it's pretty much an intractable problem, and is the reason (for example) why Solaris abandoned the two-level thread model and went back to a single level one? https://flylib.com/books/en/2.830.1.14/1/
But then again, as I said, TL;DW ;-)
You can't uninstall it, you can only disable it. That's because it's a built in plugin, those can't be disabled without breaking incremental upgrades (which personally I don't use anyway).
And like many others here, my corp explicitly forbids ANY use of ANY 3rd party LLM technologies at work. It's a disciplinary matter. So JB forcing something on people that means they could potentially lose their jobs for using IntelliJ is just monumentally stupid.
There is a workaround which is to manually delete the plugin, see https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/LLM-1760/Can-not-remove... But as above, that breaks incremental upgrades.
https://github.com/oracle/graal/blob/master/substratevm/src/...
And in any case:
JEP draft: Prepare to Restrict The Use of JNI https://openjdk.org/jeps/8307341
JEP 442: Foreign Function & Memory API (Third Preview) https://openjdk.org/jeps/442
https://docs.oracle.com/en/graalvm/jdk/21/docs/reference-man...