Are you implying. The judge was wrong to exonerate Jason Jones?
Because the evidence of a MetroCard and photograph are "flimsy"?
91 karma · joined April 25, 2017
Because the evidence of a MetroCard and photograph are "flimsy"?
Examples, your solution doesn't solve:
- Mugger waits for you to withdraw the money from ATM.
- Mugger forces you to withdraw everything AFTER you entered your PIN.
- Muggers holding someone ransom until you get them their money.
- You are traveling outside of your home country/unreliable law enforcement.
I just want to point out that billionaires don't just magically create more money for charities. Someone had to lose that money.
For the sake of simplicity, lets say... Goods & services were priced optimally to reduce the middle classes disposable income. The billionaire throws the poor-and-starving a bone every now and then.
Should the middle class have more disposable income? Or should charities get their bone? It's a matter of philosophy.
Being rich is being in control. You get to decide who gets your money.
As a budding musician. I am mentally prepare for my art to be a financial failure/setback. It comes with the territory.
This is 2017, the year of Harvey Weinstein.
For people who are in the "patriotic" group. Your country needs to maintain the infrastructure to self-sustain it's people in a world war.
What would be a more effective strategy over food subsidies?
Edit: Sorry I meant Farm subsidies, not food stamps.
I know a bank that purposely reduce their Internet banking security. To cater for specific elderly customers who constantly forget their password. They are not going to force their customers to walk into the bank everytime.
These accounts are at a risk of getting hacked. It's called a tradeoff. As a bank, do you want customers or not? Do you like money or not?
As for the Yahoo situation. If they gave a shit about customer service: they can accept copies of drivers licence/passport signed off by a justice of peace.