203 karma · joined December 18, 2014
I happen to have them bookmarked!
http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/m...
http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/m...
http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/m...
http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/m...
Er, no?
Nope, try again.
As Judith Shulevitz wrote in the New York Times, these refusals can shut down discussion in genuinely contentious areas, such as when Oxford canceled an abortion debate.
More often, they affect surprisingly minor matters, as when Hamsphire College disinvited an Afrobeat band because their lineup had too many white people in it.
Consider that tweet I linked to earlier, from critic and artist Zahira Kelly, in which she implies that the whole of scientific inquiry is somehow invalid because it has been conducted mostly by white males.
In another instance, two female professors of library science publically outed and shamed a male colleague they accused of being creepy at conferences, going so far as to openly celebrate the prospect of ruining his career.
As Judith Shulevitz wrote in the New York Times, these refusals can shut down discussion in genuinely contentious areas, such as when Oxford canceled an abortion debate.
More often, they affect surprisingly minor matters, as when Hamsphire College disinvited an Afrobeat band because their lineup had too many white people in it.
He [Chait] cites an anonymous professor who says that "she and her fellow faculty members are terrified of facing accusations of triggering trauma."
Consider that tweet I linked to earlier, from critic and artist Zahira Kelly, in which she implies that the whole of scientific inquiry is somehow invalid because it has been conducted mostly by white males.
In another instance, two female professors of library science publically outed and shamed a male colleague they accused of being creepy at conferences, going so far as to openly celebrate the prospect of ruining his career.
By the way, you seem to be the sort of person that scares him.
Rebecca Reilly Cooper, a political philosopher at the University of Warwick, worries about the effectiveness of a politics in which "particular experiences can never legitimately speak for any one other than ourselves, and personal narrative and testimony are elevated to such a degree that there can be no objective standpoint from which to examine their veracity."
Why not get someone who's actually been harmed by this change in culture to write about that? -You
Sociopaths.
It really is terrible. It can't recognize me, so I stopped caring about verification.
If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make art less intimidating for newcomers.
If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make music less intimidating for newcomers.
If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make writing less intimidating for newcomers.
If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make football less intimidating for newcomers.
If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make architecture less intimidating for newcomers.
There's nothing wrong with a skill that takes time and effort to become good at, and there's no reason to cater to people who aren't at least novices. Well, not unless you're trying to artificially inflate the labor pool so you can pay programmers less.
People disagreeing with you isn't evidence.
It's that the collateral damage of firing off such accusations indiscriminately is too great for that to be ok without evidence.
deal with them not by calling names but by making better arguments.
These are all things the flag killed comment did.
You should also pay attention to who your cherry picked quote was aimed at. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9114355
But we will do so by looking at actual data—something that isn't an option in the HN threads themselves and would mostly be off-topic there.
This is the only part that supports you view, and it's a baseless assertion. Someone did collect evidence and present it and it was on topic.
This is from your own link. He did have evidence.
Wrong. How do you verify that the third party is correct?
This has happened to me countless times.
Nothing, but with that attitude, why even use GPG at all?
All the good programmers I know can communicate fine.
That's irrelevant.
I doubt it because the API is way too complex and broad to be covered in simple x.x.x notation
They don't use that notation now?