cush

Microsoft does hire a ton of people from Infosys, Tata, Wipro, and HCL

> Software doesn't require factories, or supply chains

Sorry, what now?

If you’re already very experienced at cooking AI recipes are amazing. They cut to the chase and provide a good enough outline without all the preamble

Holy shit. I read this on mobile so didn’t actually see the recipe part because you have to scroll way down to see it. It is awful! The shopping list makes no sense and the recipe instructions literally have an “Everything else” item. Yikes…

For me, the text-only recipes I already get out of ChatGPT today are good enough

That dithering is on point

> Feels like I'm being condescended to and treated like a child

Curious why that feels condescending? Like, the average person who is seeking a recipe needs a photo to know what to shoot for

Maybe, Everything Everywhere All At Once? I don't know of many

> won't have the viral impact some creators are hoping for

Maybe that's not the point? Mario-maker is an incredible game. You can play shared levels, but the fun is all in building. Sometimes building is the game.

Isn’t this built into MacOS?

Why are we quoting a technical opinion made in 2005 as if 21 years of time passing has somehow solidified the opinion? I mean, maybe it has, but that's not how technical opinions work

They just banned algorithmic pricing in seattle grocery stores. What that means and how they can possibly enforce it, I have no idea.

5000 messages doesn't seem like a lot. Is that per agent or total?

We’re currently entering that time and people are quickly learning that empirical evidence is the new output. It’s the difference between “I think the bug is here” vs “I fixed the bug and here’s the evidence I gathered from user telemetry”

Disclosing that you got some info from an AI is way better than not. We’re all using AI in some capacity just be transparent about it. If you didn’t read the findings then say it. As always there’s nuance and it depends

It’s an agent that’s always-on and can do things proactively. It’s not an app so it’s not limited by your device.

Turns out you you just need taste and the time to iterate

This is such a genuinely useful way LLMs can truly help people. A maze of thousands of information-heavy pages distilled into a single input box. A lot of people get stopped short when presented with too much information - it's daunting. Stuff like this, while super boring and obvious and uncool, totally enables people

yeah I thought the post was going to be satirical

Kids will turn anything into a chat room. My nephew has this Google doc all his friends use to chat in in school. They just type in the page.

Haha I’m the same way but this is why pens come in a pack of 20. My guy get a cup. Fill it with pens. Put ten in your car and five in every room.

Seriously there’s zero benefit to be writing CLIs in typescript in 2026

Haha true. This is why paper and pen are so hard to beat!

This would be cool if you could write on it with a stylus. I can’t imagine typing on my fridge - too clunky

Every emerging leader should listen to this podcast as an example of how someone can literally go insane with power. It’s scary to listen to.

You’re underselling how insane he seemed. Jenson’s behavior on that podcast was completely unacceptable. So much hubris and interrupted constantly. He presented so many complete unknowns about the future as obvious and matter of fact to him. The man has completely lost his mind.

Sorry I just don't get it. It's a massive problem when a designer needs permission to force push to a repo to update a bug. These boundaries exist for a reason.

Right but it's all this ceremony that kind of all begs the question - why git? What's the motivation behind using git to do all this if the repository (where the code lives) and the tickets (bugs in the product created by building the code), are naturally out of sync? eg in many cases a bug can't be closed until someone verifies it's fixed, which happens after merge. The point at which a bug is marked as verified is arbitrary with respect to the commits and code. It's just a radom point in time as far as git is concerned. To me there's no need for git to be involved in any way and a url to a ticket in a commit message is far superior in terms of tracking

Wouldn't it require constantly pushing/fetching? Or would it effectively be like a hosted thing with a service layer on top of git showing a live view of the repo's tickets? Like github but for tickets... oh wait...

To me, tickets need to be too broadly accessible for anything like this to be viable. Any barrier to entry to creating tickets means people aren’t filing them. Every role at every level looks at them and edits them.

Yeah yeah we don’t want a centralized service, but it’s the ideal use case for a centralized service.

I look forward to it looking absolutely nothing like these concepts