349 karma · joined January 13, 2022
but now I feel so compelled [7]
register account [5]
It's possible to express yourself without resorting to words/phrases like this. Shake your vocab tree. There are a million other appropriate ways to express your belief that a person thing (or country) is backwards, regressive or foolish.
I haven't tried to replicate the author's journey, but in my experience it requires a considerable amount of hand-holding. e.g. Functions will be stubbed out, but contain no logic.
I was able to guide it through a "playable" flappy bird, bit it took several revisions where I pointed out what was wrong/needed to be done before it truly returned a functional error-free prototype.
It felt like pair-programming with a promising and apologetic junior dev.
Thanks for the good-read!
In any case, TIL that although "quit" is most common for past tense/past participle, "quitted" is sometimes included in dictionaries as an alternative.
> Theodore Twombly is a lonely, introverted man who works for a business that has professional writers compose letters for people who are unable to write letters of a personal nature themselves[0]
Thinking about it now, it's sort of funny how in that imagined future, humans are writing personal letters for others, when the technology that makes OS1 possible, exists.
[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem [1] https://mprimi.github.io/portable-secret
No, and previously you could add a hacked website to your homescreen and Apple couldn't stop you from doing so. Not speaking for the other features, but the webpush api provides no mechanism to steal info as much as it provides a way to alert a user who previously installed the app and allowed notifications that the app is sending them a notification.
Now, if after the user installing and allowing, the site gets "hacked", the hacked site operator could send push notifications that invite the user to interact with the compromised web site/app. Apple has no recourse; the pressure would have to be applied to the hosting service to shut down the site. That's a tall order for your average web user.
I still do it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Agreed. I was able to manually review 52 results, but wouldn't trust it blindly.
> also, how hard is it to get a list of abbreviations, and wrap them all in quote and comma and brackets.
Not hard at all. And I may still do that, but it was pretty enjoyable to ask the machine.
Lots of my searches are simply I want an answer, but often times I also want to then do something with the result. This is where ChatGPT is going to eat Google's lunch, IMO.
To your point, the laser doesn't produce particles that are the same size a brill bit would (larger pieces sit pretty on the bed until they are lifted away) but I reckon it might still help!
Just spitballing, but would a setup that swaps the dryer-vent-fan for suction on par with a Shop Vac be able to move those larger chunks? (add water to the Shop Vac's belly before using it as extra filtering)
I agree, but there is a fundamental difference between dealing with/managing publicly available information and contributing to it by vlogging/blogging/posting otherwise non-public details about your life and family. Sure, anyone could use the internet to find me/info about me with the right details and resolve—but I refuse to help or add to the pile by documenting my life for their perusal. Maybe I'm just turning into a curmudgeon, but I have ZERO desire to participate in this trend.
The business-end of the exhaust tube sits outside a window, and has a reservoir for collecting debris that make it through the tubing--seems to also subdue the odor.
"Senior engineering lead resigns in protest of corporate directive", on the other hand, seems like a call to arms for the conscience-driven; a thorn in corporate's side. Better to squash it and deal with the one-off "firing". Especially if it's for "cause"—then they can give nothing as severance, and quote a violation of the "employee agreement" as the reason.
Primary thought is: be honest—you've explained your situation here, do similar if you need to elsewhere. Your (past crime) story at face-value wouldn't affect my assessment of you for a technical role.
Second thought is: apply for jobs with a "professional name". Not uncommon. Your first name + your middle name, perhaps. At some point, HR will need to see/know your official name, but that's for book-keeping...you may even be able to have your corp email reflect your professional name, and only your W2 having the true record. If at any point the issue of the past comes up, simply be honest. Should that be grounds for firing you, or not hiring you, so be it. Find an outfit that will understand and give you a fair shot.
Pretty sure this is how they generated the sound that was used for those commercials once upon a time.
a 20-something experiencing "my first apartment" is not (in any way) comparable to elderly parents in an undesirable nursing home.
Which is nice. Family is important—though on the other hand, dodgy apartments and "starter houses" exist for a reason. Young adults need (and should be looking for) character-building independence and freedom. Including and not limited to paying rent on time.
In these cases, "tough love" would be move-out by $date, for your own good.
Why did he reverse course? This part is missing from your appeal so I'm wondering if you know the answer, but just find it irrelevant.
Elon Musk, previously adored by many for futurist technology advocacy and largely forgiven for quirky-billionaire-behavior is now on the "bad guy list". This is "public opinion", from my perspective. It is now common to hear people saying: "He didn't really build that" "His family had money" "His family had a mine" "He's a fascist" "He's a racist because of where/when he was born"
Any and every attempt to report on the fallout from Musk buying twitter will command the headlines. Doesn't matter if it's the same strategy any other takeover management would employ. That's irrelevant. Musk? Bad Guy.
So: "Elon Bad. Twitter suffer. Here's an example..."
Doesn't this create a situation where a bad actor could change the Wikipedia page for a `semi-popular-brand.com` url listing to something bad? Anyone who used `semi-popular-brand.idk` in that timeframe would land in the bad page. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding.
edit: misplaced modifier
/s point taken. :)
Edit: curl https://sabrinas.space/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/goo-1024x5... --output 'test.png' took 0:04:22
What I'm more surprised about is that this product got green-lit at all. I remember years ago thinking rotating company-made 11x17 printed posters on the back of each stall door was too invasive and in bad taste. The entirety of the actual office is a placard that corporate can and does use to "teach" or "inspire". Please, leave the restroom alone.
The only plausible explanation is that the decision-makers here have their own private toilets, where they can't be bothered.