The other was selected by party leaders after the primary was over.
2,272 karma · joined May 2, 2014
The other was selected by party leaders after the primary was over.
Though it’s hard to imagine how huge their next round would have to be, given what they’ve raised already.
The problem is, they’re all blogspam rehashes of the same few WWDC talks. So they all have the same blindspots and limitations, usually very surface level.
I think I’ve seen a C compiler crash once or maybe twice, ever.
Around 2014-2015 we had to start reporting the “last day of attendance” or participation for any student who failed a course. Kind of a pain when you prefer to treat your university students as adults and not take attendance.
I struggle to see why I should trust it with those things but not the account password.
I remember reading an article in Portland that the city was expecting N new people to move there in the next 10 years. So they approved construction of housing for N-200k people.
They intentionally set things up to push the poorest and most vulnerable 200k people into homelessness.
They didn’t import millions of poor people to do all the dirty or unpleasant jobs in their countries.
So much so in fact that you’d think more rich countries would help pay to maintain it.
But yet here we are…
Then the people who care only about money and power can divide and conquer.
Shame on you.
So much so that it’s looking like maybe federation is not the best model. Your server ends up hosting any room and potentially any media that any of your users gets into. So naturally server admins must take an interest us in what their users are doing. This is in conflict with the top level goals of freedom and privacy.
Maybe the simpler client-server model of the web is better after all. Then if some user on my server is also into some super weird stuff, I don’t have to know. Because they connect to the weird server directly from their client, not through me.
If you are ever at a point where you have no active sessions (aka “devices”) then other clients will not be able to send you the keys to decrypt their messages.
This is one of the many ways to get “unable to decrypt” errors in Matrix.
I think he was a Java guy too. I’m sure that just made it worse.
You do not have the ability to stop being you, the person who wants the things that you want. Even if you want to change yourself - and maybe succeed! - that desire for change is still part of being you. If you didn’t want it, you would have been someone else.
There seemed to be a surge in 2011 too, when it became apparent that the Obama administration was going to let the big banks off the hook for the financial crisis.
I can think of at least 3-4 very highly respected faculty at top institutions who are short guys. Several more whose voice would never make it in a TV or radio career.
And that’s just in CS systems and security.
Good knowledge of facts, willing to give anything a try, but not much wisdom.
If I lose my phone, I want to get all my security footage back by entering my passphrase etc on my new phone.
In other words, I want the “encrypted cloud storage” security model from [1], not the encrypted messaging security model from Signal etc.