cyclopeanutopia

Because Trump and DoD want weaponized AI.

Wow, what a colossal disconnect from reality.

That's way too unhinged comment to be real.

Yeah, and evolution was working even longer on the alignment between dogs, cats and humans - look what happened to them. Do you want your name to become Snuffles?

Wow, this sounds like a developer's hell. I hope we wake up from this nightmare.

"iron clad" :)

Someone please vibe-prove that ZFC is inconsistent.

Someone else did in this thread, but tbh I'm not inclined to give people behaving like Russian trolls too much of the benefit of doubt.

Russia is involved in many acts of sabotage in Europe over past 2 or 3 years, so this is a very natural first guess for us, European citizens. They also started increasing their activity recently.

Yeah, I can do that, but I think it is the same thing on a spectrum, just like the visual imagination.

When you look at something and close your eyes, do you also not "see it" immediately after?

> I use my inner monologue to sing or hum it in my head, I don't hear it

Wdym? I think that the inner monologue is "hearing it", with a varying degree of vividness between people, of course.

> There are a lot of us who just use the AI on projects until the session limit hits, and wait for the usage to reset.

Do you mean that you can't continue on your own until the reset?

It's more about *finding* problems. And soon there won't be anyone who can do that, thanks to people lacking imagination.

And who is "we" in your story?

And then, when you really need them, it turns out that out of ten maybe one still works and you couldn't predict which one it will be. :)

I have the same question, why OpenAI and Anthropic just don't release everything as open source?

I got to

> I am sure that OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra is top of mind for everyone right now.

and closed the tab.

Are you implying that Zuckerberg has a soul?

But the whoreshippers of The Holy Dollar will tell you it's all good and justified.

I'd say that believing to be "far ahead" is much deeper kind of coping.

But their standards are so low - given the recent incidents - that it doesn't mean much. :)

Basing this on what, if you care to share?

One can't think only about the smartest people, but the whole population.

It would require changing humans first.

Why not use rpi then?

It's a reference to Fermat's note.

Got it.

Ok, notability is a good argument for having such an article (although I'm not too sure about it really being notable), but the current shape is absolutely misleading.

Yes, that's my point.

Take any other award, list people who got it and had "incorrect beliefs", add an article about it and preamble it with "it is unclear whether it is an effect of the award". What purpose does it serve? Do you think there should be articles for all of those "diseases"?

Nebula award disease

Crossword Book award disease

Turing award disease

Pulitzer award disease

Fields medalist disease

et cetera?