Link for anyone who missed this story from April, it's not linked in the article:
4,040 karma · joined July 13, 2010
Link for anyone who missed this story from April, it's not linked in the article:
They certainly don't seem interested in answering this question, no matter how many ways I phrase it. So much for "you are in control of your data", I guess it was all BS as some people predicted.
Time is a relationship between clocks.. beyond that, yes, it's hard to say exactly.
Time seems to be what prevents everything from happening at once.
It feels more intuitive to me when thinking about it as causality always unfolding around you at the same speed, no matter your own frame.
The constant c was not named for causality, but it is a nice coincidence.
And to me, the whole Halfin-key signed message thing that Shkreli posted kind of seemed to point away from LeRoux due to the suspicious circumstances.
https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems...
Noho Diagnostic Center, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2:24-cv-07952), District Court, C.D. California
Full complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.94... [pdf]
Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69172475/noho-diagnosti...
OFFICER FRANCO conducted surveillance on multiple dates in 2023, reporting the "distinct odor of live cannabis plant"..
OFFICER FRANCO compared the power usage of the TARGET PREMISES to nearby businesses and found it significantly higher.
Sounds like Officer Franco may need some retraining.
He got caught not by the FBI breaking Tor, but just by network analysis of university network traffic logs showing a very narrow list of on-campus people using Tor at the time the threat was communicated. He quickly confessed when interviewed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/files/2013/1...
Just another factor to consider when using Tor - who's network you're on.
I tried a fake Monty Hall problem, where the presenter opens a door before the participant picks and is then offered to switch doors, so the probability remains 50% for each door. Previous models have consistently gotten this wrong, because of how many times they've seen the Monty Hall written where switching doors improves their chance of winning the prize. The chain-of-thought reasoning figured out this modification and after analyzing the conditional probabilities confidently stated: "Answer: It doesn't matter; switching or staying yields the same chance—the participant need not switch doors." Good job.
With another behind
That's a moiré
"It's not that you're not real. We all think we're real, and that's not wrong. You are real. But you think you're really real — you exaggerated."
AXS Group LLC v. Internet Referral Services LLC (2:24-cv-00377) District Court, C.D. California
Amended complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.91...
Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68163191/axs-group-llc-...
One item of the complaint is regarding the "secure.tickets" site, which I wrote about in an earlier comment below (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40906148#40910690).
Basically, brokers are using the "secure.tickets" and similar websites to proxy ticket barcodes to buyers, without going through the actual ticket transfer mechanisms on the primary ticketer AXS/TM, (similar to how this blogger does). Then resellers are delivering these ticket URLs, hosted on random websites, to Seatgeek and Stubhub customers, and those platforms are supporting their delivery by telling their customers that the tickets are legit. Sounds like AXS is fighting back against this practice.
I don't know about the specific site you mentioned, however the large broker platform Automatiq runs a number of domains like this, where they effectively proxy the original ticket token, recreate it with TOTP just as in this article, and display it to any user who has the right link in a similar format to how TM displays it. They advertise this service as "Transferless Delivery" to their ticket reseller customers. The main Automatiq one is called "secure.tickets".
It reduces work for sellers, because they never even have to transfer the tickets out of their Ticketmaster account anymore. Of course, it's horrible for buyers because they have no idea whether the random website link they were sent is actually going to serve them a barcode corresponding to a real ticket or not, or whether the site will be up, and they have no rights to the ticket as far as the primary ticket issuer (TM) is concerned, buyers don't even know the name on their own tickets.
Seatgeek and StubHub seem to be aware of these systems because of how closely they work with ticket brokers, and just coach customers to accept them if they are from any of the domains known to them. See https://support.seatgeek.com/hc/en-us/articles/2074030716443... the Automatiq site is called out specifically on that page.
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/LISA_f...
While the findings outlined in this report indicate overall improvement for DBIP participants across many targeted outcomes, minimal differences were observed when comparing outcomes across the different payment groups. This may suggest that consistent cash assistance of even $50 can improve many aspects of one’s life. Or, as we heard through member checking, it was the aggregate of the whole DIBP program that made a difference for individuals. This means the trust conveyed by delivering guaranteed income, attention by community based organizational partner staff, phones and phone plans, and connections.
I think this effect is seen a lot in various psychological and well-being studies, I'm not sure if it has a name. But basically, if someone demonstrates they are interested in your well-being and stays in touch with you, it can often have an outsized positive effect on one's life, especially when connection and support have been difficult to find.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nmid.64...