HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

d2

688 karma · joined March 26, 2011

submissionscomments
d2··on How Western Diets Are Making The World Sick
The TL:DR is: Rich people (what he calls Westerners) are fat. Poor people (like afghanis) aren't. Rich people get more diabetes which costs them money. Poor people don't. He's cut both types of people open and looked at their fat.
d2··on How not to protect against SQL injection (view source)
There are more websites than competent admins so this kind of thing is inevitable. If you were a nice guy you would have reported it to the admin and left it at that.
d2··on Quadrocopters juggle balls cooperatively
It's not a pleasant thought, but the military applications for this are many and will be very lucrative.
d2··on How to Insult a Computer Scientist
Comebacks:

Despite all the equations, it seems to me that your work didn't require any real mathematical sophistication. Did I miss something?

Yes.

----

Isn't this just a straightforward extension of an old result by Hartmanis?

Which one?

----

Am I missing something here? Can you identify any deep mathematical content in this work?

Yes you are. Next question.

----

Wasn't all this done years ago at Xerox PARC?

No, only several of the underlying technologies. Can you identify which?

----

Have you tested this on the chip Intel got running last week in their lab?

No, but I'm sure it will work because I helped design it.

----

Am I missing something? Isn't it obvious that there's a bottleneck in the system that prevents scaling to arbitrary size?

Did you miss that function isDebugOn(){ return false; } is O(1)?

d2··on Fake job reference service
Sure:

Bryan E. Kuhn, Counselor at Law. P.C, Denver, Colorado.

http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment-employee...

d2··on Fake job reference service
If you use this service you forfeit most of your legal rights as an employee.

In general, if you lie on your resume, you cannot later sue your employer claiming you were wronged. For example, if you were terminated for cause from a prior position and fail to disclose it you lose your right to sue your employer. This is called the "after-acquired evidence" theory or doctrine.

A few other examples that constitute lying:

Not putting a former employer on a resume

Making false statements about education, experience or holding professional licenses

Concealing or failing to reveal a former felony conviction, and

Making up a college degree during an interview.

EDIT: Someone asked for a source. Here are two:

http://employment.findlaw.com/employment/employment-employee...

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_treatment#After-Acqui...

Many more available from Google:

http://tinyurl.com/4972e2m

Extract from the Disparate treatment entry on wikipedia:

If an employer takes an adverse employment action against an employee for a discriminatory reason and later discovers a legitimate reason which it can prove would have led it to take the same action, the employer is still liable for the discrimination, but the relief that the employee can recover may be limited. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co., 513 U.S. 352 (1995). In general, the employee is not entitled to reinstatement or front pay, and the back pay liability period is limited to the time between the occurrence of the discriminatory act and the date the misconduct justifying the job action is discovered. McKennon, 513 U.S. at 361-62.

d2··on Magical Thinking
"In religion, folk religion and superstition, the correlation posited is between religious ritual, such as prayer, sacrifice or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense."

In Silicon Valley, the correlation posited is between investment ritual and an expected benefit or recompense.

d2··on A few points about the “tech bubble” debate
Google turned a profit every year since 2001 and earned a profit of $105.6 million on revenues of $961.8 million during 2003. They IPO'd August 2004.
d2··on A few points about the “tech bubble” debate
Which means they're valued at 51 times revenue. To put that in perspective, Google is valued at just over 6 times revenue.
d2··on A few points about the “tech bubble” debate
Chris is conflating the startup bubble with a general tech bubble and using the strength of profitable companies to defend startups.

Twitter and Color are startups with no clear business model. Groupon and Google are going concerns.

As per the blog entry: "A bubble is a decoupling of asset prices (valuations) from their underlying economic fundamentals". [Agreed!]

Throwing $45 million at Color with nothing more than an idea and the hint of an app is evidence of a bubble. So is Twitter's recent $7.7 billion valuation based on a predicted $150 million in 2011 revenue.

I know it hurts - hell it's going to hurt all of us - but you better believe it. Prepare to be profitable or die.

d2··on MySQL.com compromised via (guess what?) SQL injection
Oracle's security team bear full responsibility for this breach. MySQL's founder Monty Widenius left Sun in 2005. Sun declined, Oracle bought them as a strategic buy and the portal has been neglected to the point of being compromised.

One wonders what internal neglect MySQL is suffering behind the corporate veil.

d2··on 50% of Tweets Consumed Are Generated By Just 20K Elite Users
I'm curious what the graph of active users looks like.
d2··on Review my weekend project: Webapp to add CSS to any website and share the result
This is cool. A few suggestions:

* Add a way to delete previews you've made.

* Add more viral hooks. FB wall post, email, etc.

* Do the same concept but with javascript.

* Load each website in a frame with a 50px bar at the top or bottom with your branding and more options. This is where you'll monetize. I know you're focused on usability right now, but if it goes viral you need it to pay you or it will go away.

* Don't bother with premium features until you have a working viral loop providing consistent growth.

Best of luck!!

d2··on At least now we know why Color really got that funding
I think Color was funded for a variety of reasons, but it has very little to do with product. It's unfortunate that Bill feels he needs to defend the startup at this stage on the merits of it's product or future product - it's not a battle he can win until he has the social proof that traction provides.

For now they have cash, a great network and PR buzz that can kickstart traction.

In terms of product development, it's unfortunate they've raised so much money so early in their lifecycle. A cash surplus can really muck up the natural evolution of a product. e.g. you hire too fast and and up with a staff of 100 people all trying to justify their existence by pulling, pushing and shoving the product. No matter how strong a leader you are, it's tough to control that situation.

My prediction, and I don't feel good saying this, is that Bill and his team are going to do a lot of innovation that won't evolve into a business but will provide much inspiration for other businesses that will succeed.

← PreviousPage 3 of 3