4,528 karma · joined January 19, 2019
The demand is there - I just don’t think the revenue streams have been fully figured out yet. Ultimately I think the AI providers will converge on allowing their AI to respond to queries with sponsored suggestions, quite simply because there’s too much money being left on the table to not do that.
Google is making these massive investments because they’re terrified that they’re going to be eclipsed or turn into IBM. But Google has way more of a buffer to play the long game than OpenAI or Anthropic.
I would like to see Chinese EVs allowed into the US market to compete if not on price, at least on specs.
Built-in chatbots that you can ask how to do something make things easier for users but they may be masking UX problems.
> In 2015, the Department of Defense told a Freedom of Information Act requester, who was asking for records on tools used to preserve data on seized devices, that fulfilling their request would take 15 million hours and cost $660 million.
(15 million hours = over 1700 years)
From the BBC:
> Think of going online to visit a website like ordering some food.
> When you enter the site, the web server takes your request and runs the PHP code - like a waiter taking your order to the kitchen.
> The PHP code searches the site's database and follows a script to prepare the page - like a chef following a recipe to make a meal.
> When complete, the web server then delivers the page to the browser, and it appears on screen - that’s your waiter bringing you your dish.
Why would memory leaks in a long-running service not be relevant?
Another advantage human ports have is the opportunity to reconsider earlier architectural decisions and change them, instead of just enshrining them in the new language.