Granted, given the 30MM/day number they must be growing that index very quickly and they've likely hit that 1.5 mark pretty darn quickly.
250 karma · joined October 27, 2009
Granted, given the 30MM/day number they must be growing that index very quickly and they've likely hit that 1.5 mark pretty darn quickly.
Reference: http://bugs.developers.facebook.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10576#c7...
Came in useful from time-to-time.
And getting a pilot's license is a little bit different from being licensed to practice medicine. It also depends on whether you're referring to a private or commercial pilot. Private pilots only need 40 hours[1] of time in the air. And even once a commercial pilot is licensed, there are other regulations in place. And a driver's license is an even lower bar, of course.
So no, licensing (in any form) does not ensure that the licensee is "good" or "brilliant," but it does allow us to ensure a minimum bar that does not currently exist in the software industry today.
(And no worries, it's a pet peeve of mine as well. At least at it relates to the software industry.)
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_certification_in_the_Unit...
Yes, this the process of licensing. In those professions you mentioned, all people who (legally) work in the field must undergo a process of training and subsequent certification. This includes both work experience and exam requirements over the course of several years prior to certification. Yes, there are people that cheat the system, but the licensing exists to weed them out and protect the consumer.
Software "engineers" undergo no such process or requirements. I can learn ruby in my basement in a year, call myself a software engineer, and get hired building any number of apps. Is my work critical enough that someone may die if I am not certified? Usually not, so the need for certification isn't as strong. Nor have we had the time to develop such continuously relevant certifications in a field that changes several times a year.
Whenever I try something new, I have trouble knowing if it "goes well together" without some sort of outside confirmation. I've learned some basic tenets of what things "go with" other things, but I still don't branch out of that because of this problem.
Populating your library would take some effort, but it would be worth it.
Now couple this with another app/function that inventories your kitchen and lets you know what you can make for dinner and you've got a full blown bachelorator app.
That said, publicly disclosing a flaw in addition to defacing the website, even temporarily, is certainly not a classy way to go about it.
I'd love something that would connect with Twitter and automatically identify when I say "we should meet up" with somebody and remind me to meet up. Because I nearly always forget when I say that, especially if the person is in another city.
Brief story here: http://www.collective-e.com/how-tos-and-advice/how-did-you/a...
Wikipedia annoys me like this with the mobile web client. If I click through a Google result to wikipedia, it redirects me to m.wikipedia.com and I have to hit back twice to get to Google.
I haven't used Cubeduel, but I wonder if they're displaying user info in violation of: "Data gathered from one user's LinkedIn account/network may not be exposed to another user"
Given the huge traffic, not surprised if they're just throttled though.
And who can blame them, providing 100,000 user tweets isn't free. Not sure where he got the idea he would never have to start paying.
Turning off basic auth also hastened this demise - whereas you could once pull whatever data you wanted from Twitter using a simple curl command, now you have to figure out OAuth. It's not that much of a challenge, but it is enough of a barrier to entry to dissuade somebody who's got a couple hours on the weekend and wants to have some fun.
Finally, their partnership with Gnip is yet another indicator that this is simply not the days of the wild west anymore. You want the data, you'll have to pay.