I’m surprised to see they're not marketing towards the aviation (no pun intended) industry too.
1,019 karma · joined May 25, 2018
I’m surprised to see they're not marketing towards the aviation (no pun intended) industry too.
Surprised there’s no mention of Joe and his “AVA” on the git.
It’s quite disappointing to see [unbiased] testers promoting some systems over others, rather than trying to up the safety/capability level across the board.
I understand how donations or children of prominent alumni got around admissions...but babysitting can get someone entry over others? That seems like a bit of a stretch.
Problem with attaching a load is that if you want to build a standalone unit with the nest, you’ll need some type of inverter when powered off DC, or perhaps a simple sine wave generator? I’m more of a digital, DC power guy.
https://www.livescience.com/sun-tardigrade-solar-orbiter-ima...
It’s possible it experiences zero-G for more than just a few milliseconds at its apogee. Hence the 0mph velocity.
I wonder if we’re all are “binned” into some YouTube nerd classification.
It’s an info packed 3 days, but certainly worth it. Would recommend to anyone who’s interested in learning about flying or getting their PPL.
Recovery due to an in-flight abort would be difficult in rough seas and weather if they had to be plucked out of the Atlantic.
The aerostructure of the falcon 9 can only withstand so much side loading due to aerodynamic forces and wind before exceeding the operational limits of the rocket (body to keep it all from breaking apart, and the engines working hard to keep them on the correct trajectory).
Edit: and for the falcon 9 (non crew) https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/649911main_051612_falcon9_weather_c...
We are led to believe that safety is the most important aspect of any part of our work. At least that’s what we’re told at group meetings and company-wide meetings. But when push comes to shove and the (arbitrary) schedule demand a test, hacky code is produced, checks fall off the list, and errors do happen.
Progress seems to be more important than safety. We are instructed to show some sort of significant return on investment within 6-12 months for the funding we’ve received. It’s pretty sad.
Telling mangers that we need to take it low and slow at first makes them angry and ignore the engineers who do the good work in exchange for engineers who do it fast.
This book is especially interesting to anyone building systems where humans are required to interface with a computer on a “mission-critical” level.
It goes in-depth about the new type of electrical component-integrated circuits used in the guidance system. And more about other aspects of the navigation systems used on Apollo.
I recommend.
I’m (almost) deathly afraid to ride make the short 4 mile trek across the river for exactly this reason. I lament every day I get on the T to slog for 45 minutes on a decrepit, slow, and usually broken train system. I arrive to work bothered by my commute almost every day.
For Boston/Cambridge being such a bio and tech hub, it’s entire transit system (roads, busses, trains, biking) is amongst the worst I know of in the US.
Sad.
It was a cool concept and got me interested into materials science. Unfortunately the post doc didn’t seem to care too much and the work didn’t go anywhere.
Neat stuff none the less.
Would have been nice to add some sort of discriptor indicating what type of dataset it is. For example, I personally have no clue off the top of my head what the “MURA” dataset is.
Edit: I now see there is a little icon on the left of all lines. Bit ambiguous, but it sorta gets the point across.